Mukherjee Arun, Raison Maxime, Sahni Tarun, Arya Anand, Lambert Jean, Marois Pierre, James Philip B, Parent Audrey, Ballaz Laurent
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;41(2):77-85.
The present study aimed to assess the effect of intensive rehabilitation combined with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
We carried out an open, observational, platform-independent study in 150 children with cerebral palsy with follow-up over eight months to compare the effects of standard intensive rehabilitation only (control group n = 20) to standard intensive rehabilitation combined with one of three different hyperbaric treatments. The three hyperbaric treatments used were: air (FiO2 = 21%) pressurized to 1.3 atmospheres absolute/atm abs (n = 40); 100% oxygen pressurized at 1.5 atm abs (n = 32); and 100% oxygen, pressurized at 1.75 atm abs (n = 58). Each subject assigned to a hyperbaric arm was treated one hour per day, six days per week during seven weeks (40 sessions). Gross motor function measure (GMFM) was evaluated before the treatments and at two, four, six and eight months after beginning the treatments.
All four groups showed improvements over the course of the treatments in the follow-up evaluations (p < 0.001). However, GMFM improvement in the three hyperbaric groups was significantly superior to the GMFM improvement in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the three hyperbaric groups.
The eight-month-long benefits we have observed with combined treatments vs. rehabilitation can only have been due to a beneficial effect of hyperbaric treatment.
本研究旨在评估强化康复联合高压氧(HBO2)治疗对脑瘫(CP)患儿粗大运动功能的影响。
我们对150例脑瘫患儿进行了一项开放性、观察性、与平台无关的研究,随访8个月,比较单纯标准强化康复(对照组n = 20)与标准强化康复联合三种不同高压治疗之一的效果。所使用的三种高压治疗方法分别为:空气(FiO2 = 21%)加压至1.3绝对大气压/atm abs(n = 40);100%氧气加压至1.5 atm abs(n = 32);以及100%氧气加压至1.75 atm abs(n = 58)。分配到高压治疗组的每个受试者每天治疗1小时,每周6天,共7周(40次治疗)。在治疗前以及开始治疗后的2个月、4个月、6个月和8个月评估粗大运动功能测量(GMFM)。
在随访评估中,所有四组在治疗过程中均有改善(p < 0.001)。然而,三个高压治疗组的GMFM改善明显优于对照组的GMFM改善(p < 0.001)。三个高压治疗组之间没有显著差异。
我们观察到联合治疗与康复相比长达8个月的益处只能归因于高压治疗的有益效果。