Schnabel Marco J, Gierth Michael, Bründl Johannes, Chaussy Christian G, Burger Maximilian, Fritsche Hans-Martin
Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg , Regensburg, Germany .
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1034-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0162. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the gold standard treatment of patients with most renal and proximal ureteral calculi. Severe bleeding complications in SWL are extremely rare. Uncorrected bleeding diathesis might increase the risk and is considered to be an absolute contraindication for SWL. Perioperative management of anticoagulative and antiplatelet therapy has changed in the recent past. In particular, low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is no longer a contraindication for many surgical procedures.
A systematic Medline/PubMed literature search of peer-reviewed scientific articles in urology and cardiovascular medicine was performed concerning the management of anticoagulative and antiplatelet medication during SWL.
The literature on medically acquired and pathological bleeding diathesis and SWL in general is rare, retrospective, nonstandardized, and of low quality. Routine cessation of obligatory indicated anticoagulative or antiplatelet medication implies a significant risk for cardiovascular adverse events (CAE). Ureterorenoscopy is recommended in patients with uncorrected bleeding diathesis, although this is not based on high-level evidence.
In patients with obligatory intake of anticoagulative or antiplatelet medication, the risk for CAE must be balanced against the SWL-induced bleeding risk. In patients with low-dose ASA-intake, SWL should be considered as an option instead of being disregarded as an absolute contraindication. Prospective randomized trials designed to define the optimal management of anticoagulants and antiplatelets during SWL are warranted.
冲击波碎石术(SWL)是大多数肾和近端输尿管结石患者的金标准治疗方法。SWL 中严重出血并发症极为罕见。未纠正的出血倾向可能会增加风险,被视为 SWL 的绝对禁忌证。近年来,抗凝和抗血小板治疗的围手术期管理发生了变化。特别是,低剂量阿司匹林(ASA)不再是许多外科手术的禁忌证。
对泌尿外科和心血管医学领域经同行评审的科学文章进行了系统的 Medline/PubMed 文献检索,内容涉及 SWL 期间抗凝和抗血小板药物的管理。
关于医源性和病理性出血倾向以及一般 SWL 的文献很少,多为回顾性、非标准化且质量较低。常规停用必要的抗凝或抗血小板药物意味着发生心血管不良事件(CAE)的风险显著增加。对于出血倾向未纠正的患者,建议采用输尿管肾镜检查,尽管这并非基于高级别证据。
对于必须服用抗凝或抗血小板药物的患者,必须在 CAE 风险与 SWL 引起的出血风险之间进行权衡。对于服用低剂量 ASA 的患者,应将 SWL 视为一种选择,而不应将其作为绝对禁忌证而不予考虑。有必要开展前瞻性随机试验,以确定 SWL 期间抗凝剂和抗血小板药物的最佳管理方法。