Lao William Shihao, Puligandla Pramod, Baird Robert
McGill University, Montreal Quebec, Canada.
Department of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal Quebec Canada.
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 May;49(5):811-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.02.068. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
The CanMEDS competency "scholar" encompasses the creation, dissemination, application, and translation of medical knowledge. We hypothesize that a structured journal club (JC) for pediatric surgical trainees would meet these objectives in an enjoyable and long-lasting manner.
A JC involving two pediatric surgery training programs was created with each session focusing on a specific study design. Pre-tests/post-tests were administered before/after each session with durability of learning assessed during the following session. Metrics analyzed included participant satisfaction and an appraisal of evidence-based medicine (EBM) principals. Test results were analyzed using the paired T-test with p<0.05 considered significant.
On average, 14 participants attended each session, with all trainees present (4). While participants believed they understood EBM principles, 40% were unfamiliar with question formulation, 48% were unfamiliar with critical appraisal tools, and 60% had not appraised an article within the previous year. Pre-test to post-test comparison yielded an improvement in mean score (20=perfect score): 10.8 to 16.9, p<0.01. Measures of participant satisfaction were uniformly positive.
A structured Pediatric Surgery Journal Club addresses scholarly training objectives in a highly satisfactory manner and yields durable learning. A web-based curriculum based on this model could serve as an important educational tool for trainees and attending staff alike.
加拿大医学教育认证委员会(CanMEDS)的“学者”能力包括医学知识的创造、传播、应用和转化。我们假设,为小儿外科住院医师设立一个结构化的期刊俱乐部(JC)将以一种有趣且持久的方式实现这些目标。
创建了一个涉及两个小儿外科培训项目的期刊俱乐部,每一次活动聚焦于一种特定的研究设计。在每次活动前后进行前测/后测,并在下一次活动期间评估学习的持久性。分析的指标包括参与者满意度和对循证医学(EBM)原则的评估。使用配对t检验分析测试结果,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
平均每次活动有14名参与者,所有住院医师均出席(共4人)。虽然参与者认为他们理解循证医学原则,但40%的人不熟悉问题的提出,48%的人不熟悉批判性评估工具,60%的人在前一年没有评估过一篇文章。前测与后测的比较显示平均得分有所提高(满分20分):从10.8分提高到16.9分,p<0.01。参与者满意度的各项指标均为积极。
一个结构化的小儿外科期刊俱乐部以高度令人满意的方式实现了学术培训目标,并产生了持久的学习效果。基于此模式的网络课程可以成为住院医师和主治医生的重要教育工具。