Tokidis E, Perin G, Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Balasubramanian S P
Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK.
World J Surg. 2025 Apr;49(4):916-929. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12479. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a fundamental element of modern surgical practice. However, its integration into surgical training remains challenging. Through a scoping review, this study mapped existing evidence on the practice of EBM in surgery, focusing on knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and curricula.
The literature was systematically searched through 3 databases and 2 registers. Fifty articles published over a 22-year period (2001-2023) were identified based on predefined eligibility criteria. These were reviewed using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. The review was checked against the PRISMA 2018 checklist for scoping reviews.
There is evidence of awareness and appreciation of EBM principles among surgeons and surgical trainees. However, the understanding of EBM terminology is varied. Attitudes toward EBM were predominantly positive yet reliance on clinical experience over evidence-based guidelines was noted. Key barriers to EBM practice included time constraints, lack of structured training, and methodological challenges in surgical research. The review highlighted the lack of validated competency assessment tools and the need for structured EBM curricula. Various educational strategies, such as journal clubs and courses, were found to improve EBM knowledge, albeit with limited evidence on long-term practice change.
This scoping review underscores the need for a more detailed understanding of stakeholder views of EBM in surgical practice, the development, implementation, and assessment of educational interventions in this field, and tailored strategies to assess EBM competency in surgery.
循证医学(EBM)是现代外科实践的基本要素。然而,将其融入外科培训仍然具有挑战性。通过一项范围综述,本研究梳理了关于外科领域循证医学实践的现有证据,重点关注知识、态度、障碍和课程设置。
通过3个数据库和2个登记处系统检索文献。根据预先确定的纳入标准,确定了22年期间(2001 - 2023年)发表的50篇文章。使用阿克斯赛和奥马利的方法框架对这些文章进行了综述。该综述对照PRISMA 2018范围综述清单进行了检查。
有证据表明外科医生和外科实习生对循证医学原则有认识和理解。然而,对循证医学术语的理解各不相同。对外科医生对循证医学的态度总体上是积极的,但也注意到他们更依赖临床经验而非循证指南。循证医学实践的主要障碍包括时间限制、缺乏结构化培训以及外科研究中的方法学挑战。该综述强调了缺乏经过验证的能力评估工具以及需要结构化的循证医学课程。尽管关于长期实践改变的证据有限,但发现各种教育策略,如期刊俱乐部和课程,可提高循证医学知识。
这项范围综述强调需要更详细地了解利益相关者对外科实践中循证医学的看法、该领域教育干预措施的开发、实施和评估,以及评估外科循证医学能力的针对性策略。