Emmons K M, Emont S L, Collins R L, Weidner G
Miriam Hospital/Brown University.
J Subst Abuse. 1988;1(1):79-89. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(88)80011-7.
The efficacy of a smoking cessation relapse prevention (RP) program, emphasizing cognitive-behavioral coping skills, was compared to that of a broad spectrum (BS) program, which emphasized behavioral skills. It was hypothesized that the RP program would be more effective in producing long-term abstinence, compared to the BS package. Abstinence rates validated by saliva thiocyanate and carbon monoxide, as well as self-report of smoking reduction, were measured at posttreatment, 3 and 6 months. No differences in posttreatment quit rates were found between the two groups, although both programs produced significantly higher quit rates than the wait-list control group. Contrary to prediction, the BS group produced marginally significantly greater abstinence at 3 months. No differences in abstinence were found at 6 months. Reduction in cigarette consumption was marginally significantly greater for the BS group at 3 and 6 months. Various mediators of treatment outcome were not found to influence success in quitting. There was a significant weight gain in those who quit.
将一项强调认知行为应对技巧的戒烟预防复吸(RP)项目的效果,与一项强调行为技巧的广谱(BS)项目的效果进行了比较。研究假设,与BS项目相比,RP项目在实现长期戒烟方面会更有效。在治疗后、3个月和6个月时,测量了通过唾液硫氰酸盐和一氧化碳验证的戒烟率,以及吸烟减少的自我报告。两组在治疗后的戒烟率上没有差异,尽管两个项目产生的戒烟率都显著高于等待名单对照组。与预测相反,BS组在3个月时的戒烟率略高。在6个月时,两组在戒烟方面没有差异。在3个月和6个月时,BS组的香烟消费量减少略多。未发现各种治疗结果的调节因素会影响戒烟的成功。戒烟者体重显著增加。