Branzén Marie, Eliasson Alf, Arnrup Kristina, Bazargani Farhan
Specialist Clinic of Orthodontics, Public Dental Health Service, Karlstad, Sweden.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Postgraduate Dental Education Center and School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1134-40. doi: 10.1111/cid.12233. Epub 2014 May 22.
Knowledge of the long-term survival of single implants in cases of congenitally missing lateral incisors in the maxilla is limited.
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the 5-year survival of implants and implant-supported crowns (ISCs) and to assess the functional and aesthetic outcomes from the professional and patient perspectives.
From a total of 46 patients with congenitally missing upper lateral incisors, 36 patients treated with 54 Brånemark® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) implants and ISCs participated in the study. A clinical examination, California Dental Association (CDA) evaluation, and patient questionnaire were used to rate and compare the objective and subjective evaluations of the ISCs.
The survival of implants and ISCs was 100%. The CDA ratings were satisfactory for all ISCs, with 70% being rated excellent. The patient rating was also high for the overall satisfaction item, with 21 being completely satisfied and 14 fairly satisfied. However, 12 patients wished for the replacement of their ISCs. Logistic regression analysis indicated that a less optimal embrasure fill was the most discriminating factor though not statistically significant (p = .082).
One-third of the patients wished for the replacement of their ISCs. Soft tissue adaptation seems to be an important factor for overall satisfaction.
关于上颌先天性侧切牙缺失病例中单个种植体的长期存留情况的了解有限。
本回顾性研究旨在评估种植体及种植体支持式冠(ISC)的5年存留率,并从专业人员和患者的角度评估其功能和美学效果。
在总共46例先天性上颌侧切牙缺失的患者中,36例接受了54颗Brånemark®(诺贝尔生物科技公司,瑞典哥德堡)种植体及ISC治疗的患者参与了本研究。采用临床检查、加利福尼亚牙科协会(CDA)评估和患者问卷对ISC进行客观和主观评估并比较。
种植体及ISC的存留率为100%。所有ISC的CDA评分均令人满意,其中70%被评为优秀。患者对总体满意度项目的评分也很高,21人完全满意,14人比较满意。然而,12例患者希望更换其ISC。逻辑回归分析表明,龈间隙充填欠佳是最具区分性的因素,尽管无统计学意义(p = 0.082)。
三分之一的患者希望更换其ISC。软组织适应性似乎是总体满意度的一个重要因素。