• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小直径种植体修复先天性上颌侧切牙缺失:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性、对照、临床研究。

Narrow diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: A 1-year prospective, controlled, clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Aug;33(8):844-857. doi: 10.1111/clr.13966. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1111/clr.13966
PMID:35763401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9544295/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To report the clinical, radiographic, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes after placement of a newly developed narrow-diameter implant (NDI) in patients with congenitally missing lateral incisors (MLIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with MLIs with a mesio-distal distance between the canine and the central incisor of 5.9-6.3 mm received a dental implant with a diameter of 2.9 mm (Test), while a diameter of 3.3 mm (Control) was used when the distance was 6.4-7.1 mm. After healing, a cement-retained bi-layered zirconia crown was fabricated. At the 1-year follow-up (T2), implant survival rate, marginal crestal bone level (CBL) changes, biological and technical complications were registered. The esthetic outcome was assessed by using the Copenhagen index score, and the patient-reported outcomes were recorded using the OHIP-49 questionnaire.

RESULTS

One hundred patients rehabilitated with 100 dental implants Ø0.9 mm (n = 50) or Ø3.3 mm (n = 50) were included. One Ø3.3 mm implant was lost, and seven patients dropped out of the study, yielding an implant survival rate of 99% (p = 1.000). At T2 a. CBL of -0.19 ± 0.25 mm (Test) and -0.25 ± 0.31 mm (Control) was detected, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .342). Good to excellent esthetic scores (i.e., 1-2) were recorded in most of cases. Technical complications (i.e., loss of retention, abutment fracture, and chipping of veneering ceramic) occurred once in three patients with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p > .05). OHIP scores did not differ significantly at follow-ups between groups (p = .110).

CONCLUSION

The use of Ø2.9 mm diameter implants represents as reliable a treatment option as Ø3.3 mm implants, in terms of CBL changes, biological and technical complications. Favorable esthetics and patient-reported outcomes were recorded for both groups.

摘要

目的

报告在先天缺失侧切牙(MLI)患者中植入新型小直径种植体(NDI)后的临床、放射学、美观和患者报告结果。

材料和方法

犬齿和中切牙之间的近远中距离为 5.9-6.3mm 的 MLI 患者接受直径为 2.9mm 的牙科种植体(测试),而距离为 6.4-7.1mm 的患者则使用直径为 3.3mm 的种植体(对照)。愈合后,制作了一个粘结固位的双层氧化锆冠。在 1 年随访(T2)时,记录种植体存活率、边缘嵴骨水平(CBL)变化、生物学和技术并发症。使用哥本哈根指数评分评估美观效果,使用 OHIP-49 问卷记录患者报告结果。

结果

100 名患者接受了 100 个直径 0.9mm(n=50)或 3.3mm(n=50)的牙科种植体修复,其中 1 个 3.3mm 种植体脱落,7 名患者退出研究,种植体存活率为 99%(p=1.000)。在 T2 时,检测到测试组的 CBL 为-0.19±0.25mm,对照组为-0.25±0.31mm,两组间无统计学差异(p=0.342)。大多数病例记录了良好到优秀的美学评分(即 1-2 分)。技术并发症(即固位体丢失、基台折断和饰面陶瓷崩裂)在每组各发生 1 次,两组间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。在随访期间,两组间 OHIP 评分无显著差异(p=0.110)。

结论

在 CBL 变化、生物学和技术并发症方面,使用 2.9mm 直径种植体作为治疗选择与 3.3mm 种植体一样可靠。两组均记录了良好的美观和患者报告结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/0d8fdea3792d/CLR-33--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/244b0a106798/CLR-33--g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/bb74e7a8aded/CLR-33--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/fd7bbec4463d/CLR-33--g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/77829b51eea6/CLR-33--g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/0d8fdea3792d/CLR-33--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/244b0a106798/CLR-33--g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/bb74e7a8aded/CLR-33--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/fd7bbec4463d/CLR-33--g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/77829b51eea6/CLR-33--g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a94f/9544295/0d8fdea3792d/CLR-33--g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Narrow diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: A 1-year prospective, controlled, clinical study.小直径种植体修复先天性上颌侧切牙缺失:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性、对照、临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Aug;33(8):844-857. doi: 10.1111/clr.13966. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic outcomes at two narrow-diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: A 3-year prospective, clinical study.临床、影像学和美学效果评价:采用两种窄直径种植体修复先天性上颌侧切牙缺失:一项为期 3 年的前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Aug;26(4):777-786. doi: 10.1111/cid.13339. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Small-Diameter Dental Implant Used for the Restoration of Patients with Permanent Tooth Agenesis (Hypodontia) in the Maxillary Lateral Incisor and Mandibular Incisor Regions: A 36-Month Follow-Up.用于上颌侧切牙和下颌切牙区恒牙先天缺失(缺牙症)患者修复的小直径牙种植体的临床和影像学评估:36个月随访
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):147-53. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4444.
4
A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis.一项针对牙齿发育不全患者的全陶瓷和金属陶瓷材料种植体支持单颗牙修复的3年前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Oct;24(10):1078-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02514.x. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
5
Prospective cohort study to evaluate narrow diameter implants for restoration of a missing lateral incisor in patients with a cleft palate: One-year results.前瞻性队列研究评估用于修复腭裂患者缺失侧切牙的小直径种植体:一年结果。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1265-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Four single implant-supported crowns replacing the maxillary incisors: A retrospective report of 10 cases with 2-9 years of follow-up.四颗单颗种植体支持的上颌中切牙冠修复:10例随访2至9年的回顾性报告
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Dec;34(12):1438-1449. doi: 10.1111/clr.14175. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
Marginal Bone Loss and Pink Esthetic Evaluation of Narrow-Diameter Dental Implants for Single Crowns: 1-Year Prospective Clinical Study.窄径种植体单冠修复 1 年的边缘骨吸收和粉色美学评估:前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):515-524. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9051.
8
Experimental custom-made zirconia abutments for narrow implants in esthetically demanding regions: a 5-year follow-up.实验性定制氧化锆基台用于美学要求高的狭窄种植区域:5 年随访研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1239-42.
9
Immediate provisionalization of 3.0-mm-diameter implants replacing single missing maxillary and mandibular incisors: 1-year prospective study.3.0 毫米直径种植体即刻修复单个上颌和下颌切牙缺失:1 年前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):173-80.
10
A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations.一项为期1年的随机对照试验,比较氧化锆与金属陶瓷种植体支持的单颗牙修复体。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Winter;4(4):347-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Options for Unilateral Agenesis of the Maxillary Lateral Incisor Combined with Contralateral Microdontic or Peg-Shaped Lateral Incisor: A Systematic Review.上颌侧切牙单侧缺牙合并对侧小牙畸形或钉状侧切牙的治疗选择:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(4):169. doi: 10.3390/dj13040169.
2
Retrospective Study of Functional and Esthetic Outcomes Using Narrow-Diameter Implants for Single Upper Central Incisor Replacements.使用窄直径种植体进行单颗上颌中切牙种植修复的功能和美学效果的回顾性研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(4):144. doi: 10.3390/dj13040144.
3
Survival rate and marginal bone loss in titanium vs titanium-zirconia single-unit narrow diameter implants. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of prospective studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses.固定和可摘种植体支持式义齿修复患者的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):201-237. doi: 10.1111/prd.12419.
2
Prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillary lateral incisors agenesis using dental mini-implants: a multicenter 10-year follow-up.上颌侧切牙缺失的种植义齿修复:一项多中心十年随访研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1963-1974. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04176-0. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
3
Esthetic, mechanical, and biological outcomes of various implant abutments for single-tooth replacement in the anterior region: a systematic review of the literature.
钛与钛锆单单位窄直径种植体的生存率和边缘骨丢失。前瞻性研究的系统评价和Meta分析。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):e499-e511. doi: 10.4317/medoral.27042.
4
Improved new bone formation capacity of hyaluronic acid-bone substitute compound in rat calvarial critical size defect.透明质酸-骨替代物复合物在大鼠颅骨临界尺寸缺损中改善新骨形成能力。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 24;24(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04679-8.
5
Retention of Mandibular Complete Overdentures using Mini Dental Implants (Ø < 3 mm) and Standard Diameter Implants (Ø > 3mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.使用微型牙种植体(<3mm)和标准直径种植体(>3mm)保留下颌全口义齿:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 May 7;22:181-188. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5282167.
6
Clinical analysis of the tooth-implant papilla for two narrow-diameter titanium-zirconium implants in the anterior area: prospective controlled clinical study.前牙区两颗窄直径钛锆合金种植体的种植体袖口临床分析:前瞻性对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04075-2.
7
Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study.一种窄径(2.9mm)骨水平种植体的临床安全性和性能评估:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性单臂多中心研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Sep 19;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00495-x.
8
The Comparison of Survival Rates between Narrow Diameter Implants and Standard Diameter Implants: An Updated Meta-analysis.窄径种植体与标准径种植体生存率的比较:一项更新的Meta分析。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Feb 9;37:5. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.5. eCollection 2023.
9
CORRIGENDUM.勘误
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Nov;33(11):1182. doi: 10.1111/clr.13990.
10
Preparation of hybrid samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled to focused ion beam (FIB) analysis: A new way to study cell adhesion to titanium implant surfaces.用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)与聚焦离子束(FIB)分析联用的混合样品制备:一种研究细胞与钛植入物表面黏附的新方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 2;17(8):e0272486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272486. eCollection 2022.
在前牙区单颗牙缺失修复中,各种种植体基台的美观、力学和生物学效果:文献系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Sep 8;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00370-7.
4
Soft tissue management at implants: Summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021.种植体周围软组织处理:第 6 届 EAO 共识会议 2021 小组 2 的总结和共识声明。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):174-180. doi: 10.1111/clr.13798.
5
Need for lateral bone augmentation at two narrow-diameter implants: A prospective, controlled, clinical study.需要在两个细直径种植体上进行侧向骨增量:一项前瞻性、对照、临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Apr;32(4):511-520. doi: 10.1111/clr.13721. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Factors Affecting Decision-Making For Congenitally Missing Permanent Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A Retrospective Study.影响先天性上颌侧切牙缺失决策的因素:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020 Feb 27;28(1):43-52. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_1959Kafantaris10.
7
Timing of Implant Placement after Traumatic Dental Injury.创伤性牙损伤后种植体放置的时机。
J Endod. 2019 Dec;45(12S):S52-S56. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis.窄直径种植体与常规直径种植体的临床性能:一项荟萃分析。
J Oral Implantol. 2019 Dec;45(6):503-508. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00025. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
9
Implant-supported 2-unit cantilevers compared with single crowns on adjacent implants: A comparative retrospective case series.种植体支持的 2 单位悬臂与相邻种植体上的单冠比较:一项回顾性病例系列比较研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 May;123(5):717-723. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
10
The treatment dilemma of missing maxillary lateral incisors-Part I: Canine substitution and resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses.上颌侧切牙缺失的治疗困境-第一部分:尖牙替代及树脂黏结固定修复体。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jul;31(4):311-318. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12484. Epub 2019 Apr 29.