Mikoya Tadashi, Shibukawa Toyoko, Susami Takafumi, Sato Yoshiaki, Tengan Toshimoto, Katashima Hirotaka, Oyama Akihiko, Matsuzawa Yusuke, Ito Yumi, Funayama Emi
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015 May;52(3):277-86. doi: 10.1597/13-285. Epub 2014 May 22.
To compare dental arch relationship outcomes following one- and two-stage palatal repair.
Nonrandomized, clinical trial with concurrent control.
Hokkaido University Hospital.
Sixty-eight consecutively treated Japanese patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Thirty-one of the 68 patients underwent two-stage palatoplasty with delayed hard palate closure, and 37 patients underwent one-stage pushback palatoplasty.
Dental casts were taken at 4.9 to 6.3 (mean: 5.2) years of age in the two-stage group and at 4.0 to 6.3 (mean: 5.1) years of age in the one-stage group, and dental arch relationships were assessed using the 5-Year-Olds' Index (5-Y) by four raters and the Huddart/Bodenham Index (HB) by two raters.
Intrarater and interrater reliabilities evaluated using weighted kappa statistics were good or better for the 5-Y and HB ratings. The mean 5-Y score was 2.94 in the two-stage group and 3.13 in the one-stage group (P value was not significant). However, there was a significant difference in distributions between the groups (P < .05). The HB scores of molars were significantly greater in the two-stage group than in the one-stage group (P < .05). The rank correlation coefficients between the 5-Y and total HB score (ρ = -0.840, P < .01) and between the 5-Y and the score of the incisors in the HB (ρ = -0.814, P < .01) were significantly increased.
These results suggest that the anteroposterior relationship was not significantly different between the groups, but the transversal relationship was better in the two-stage group than in the one-stage group.
比较一期和二期腭裂修复术后牙弓关系的结果。
非随机同期对照临床试验。
北海道大学医院。
68例连续接受治疗的日本完全性单侧唇腭裂患者。
68例患者中,31例行二期腭裂修复术,硬腭延迟关闭;37例行一期后推腭裂修复术。
二期组在4.9至6.3岁(平均5.2岁)时取牙模,一期组在4.0至6.3岁(平均5.1岁)时取牙模,由4名评估者使用5岁儿童指数(5-Y)和2名评估者使用赫德特/博德汉姆指数(HB)评估牙弓关系。
使用加权kappa统计评估的评估者内和评估者间信度在5-Y和HB评分中良好或更佳。二期组的平均5-Y评分为2.94,一期组为3.13(P值无统计学意义)。然而,两组之间的分布存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。二期组磨牙的HB评分显著高于一期组(P < 0.05)。5-Y与总HB评分之间的等级相关系数(ρ = -0.840,P < 0.01)以及5-Y与HB中切牙评分之间的等级相关系数(ρ = -0.814,P < 0.01)显著增加。
这些结果表明,两组之间的前后关系无显著差异,但二期组的横向关系优于一期组。