• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自固定双向倒刺可吸收缝线在经腹膜后腹腔镜部分肾切除术的应用。

Application of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperito- neoscopic partial nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital , Yantai 264000, China.

Department of Gynecology (ZYL), Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital , Yantai 264000, China.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):220-4. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.12.

DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.12
PMID:24856489
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and feasibility of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture application in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From Sep 2011 and Aug 2012, 76 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were performed at our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) group (n = 36) and non-SRBS group (n = 40). There was no significant difference in age, sex, tumor size and location between the two groups. Clinical data and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

All 76 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were successfully performed, without conversion to open surgery or serious intraoperative complications. In the SRBS group, the suture time, warm ischemia time and operation blood loss were significantly shorter than that of non-SRBS group (p < 0.01), and operation time and hospital stay were shorter than that of non-SRBS group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy could shorten suture time and warm ischemia time, with good safety and feasibility, worthy of being used in clinic.

摘要

目的

探讨自固定双向倒刺可吸收缝线在腹膜后腹腔镜肾部分切除术应用的安全性和可行性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 9 月至 2012 年 8 月我院收治的 76 例行腹膜后腹腔镜肾部分切除术患者的临床资料,根据术中是否使用自固定双向倒刺可吸收缝线将患者分为自固定双向倒刺可吸收缝线组(SRBS 组,n=36)和非 SRBS 组(n=40)。比较两组患者的年龄、性别、肿瘤大小及位置等一般资料,观察并记录两组患者手术时间、热缺血时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症等手术相关指标。

结果

76 例患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放手术病例,无严重手术并发症发生。SRBS 组患者的手术时间、热缺血时间、缝线时间均明显短于非 SRBS 组,术中出血量明显少于非 SRBS 组(P<0.01),手术时间及术后住院时间均短于非 SRBS 组(P<0.05)。

结论

在腹膜后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中应用自固定双向倒刺可吸收缝线有助于缩短手术时间和热缺血时间,安全、可行,值得临床推广应用。

相似文献

1
Application of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperito- neoscopic partial nephrectomy.自固定双向倒刺可吸收缝线在经腹膜后腹腔镜部分肾切除术的应用。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):220-4. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.12.
2
The use of self-retaining barbed suture preserves superior renal function during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a PADUA score matched comparison.在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中使用自固定倒刺缝线可保留较好的肾功能:一项PADUA评分匹配对照研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Feb;25(2):130-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0302.
3
Self-retaining barbed suture for parenchymal repair during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; initial clinical experience.腹腔镜部分肾切除术时用于实质修复的自固定倒刺缝线;初步临床经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):906-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10547.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
4
Self-retaining barbed suture reduces warm ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.自固定倒刺缝线可减少腹腔镜肾部分切除术期间的热缺血时间。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018 Oct;27(5):272-277. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1438473. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
The Self-Retaining Barbed Suture for Parenchymal Repair in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜部分肾切除术中用于实质修复的自固定倒刺缝线:系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Innov. 2019 Dec;26(6):744-752. doi: 10.1177/1553350619856167. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
6
[Simplified renorrhaphy using self-retaining barbed suture during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy].腹腔镜下部分肾切除术期间使用自固定倒刺缝线进行简化肾缝合术
Actas Urol Esp. 2012 Sep;36(8):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
7
Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study.机器人辅助后腹腔镜部分肾切除术的技术和结果:一项多中心研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.028. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Partial nephrectomy: is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case-control comparison.部分肾切除术:围手术期使用自固定倒刺缝线是否有优势?一项匹配的病例对照比较。
World J Urol. 2012 Oct;30(5):659-64. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0933-y. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
9
Comparison of two different renorrhaphy techniques in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumor.对比两种不同的肾缝合技术在腹膜后腹腔镜部分肾切除术中治疗复杂肿瘤的效果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(24):4629-32.
10
Knotless retroperitoneoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses: Comparison of bipolar sutureless technique and barbed suture technique.无结后腹腔镜保留肾单位手术治疗小肾肿瘤:双极免打结技术与倒刺缝线技术的比较
J Int Med Res. 2018 Apr;46(4):1649-1656. doi: 10.1177/0300060518760737. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of self-retaining double-needle barb suture in transabdominal path robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer.自固定双针倒刺缝线在经腹途径机器人辅助腹腔镜下T1期肾癌部分肾切除术中的疗效及安全性
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13825-6.
2
The application of barbed suture during the partial nephrectomy may modify perioperative results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在部分肾切除术中应用倒刺缝线可能会改变围手术期结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0435-3.
3
Comparison of surgical time and complication rate of subcutaneous and skin closure using barbed suture or traditional knotted suture in dogs.
使用倒刺缝线或传统打结缝线对犬进行皮下和皮肤缝合的手术时间及并发症发生率比较
Can Vet J. 2017 Dec;58(12):1281-1286.
4
Application of renal-rotation techniques in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy.肾脏旋转技术在腹膜后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术中的应用。
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Apr;9(4):1149-1152. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2294. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
5
Laparascopic nephrectomy: different techniques and approaches.腹腔镜肾切除术:不同的技术与方法。
Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Feb;16(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0476-4.