Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Hum Pathol. 2014 Jul;45(7):1315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
Melanocytic proliferations are notoriously difficult lesions to evaluate histologically, even among experts, as there is a lack of objective, highly reproducible criteria, which can be broadly applied to the wide range of melanocytic lesions encountered in daily practice. These difficult diagnoses are undeniably further compounded by the substantial medicolegal risks of an "erroneous" diagnosis. Molecular information and classification of melanocytic lesions is already vast and constantly expanding. The application of molecular techniques for the diagnosis of benignity or malignancy is, at times, confusing and limits its utility if not used properly. In addition, current and future therapies will necessitate molecular classification of melanoma into one of several distinct subtypes for appropriate patient-specific therapy. An understanding of what different molecular markers can and cannot predict is of the utmost importance. We discuss both mutational analysis and chromosomal gains/losses to help clarify this continually developing and confusing facet of pathology.
黑素细胞性增生是一种非常难以进行组织学评估的病变,即使是专家也难以判断,因为缺乏客观、高度可重复的标准,而这些标准可以广泛应用于日常实践中遇到的各种黑素细胞性病变。这些困难的诊断无疑因“错误”诊断的巨大法律风险而变得更加复杂。黑素细胞性病变的分子信息和分类已经非常广泛,并在不断扩展。分子技术在诊断良恶性方面的应用有时会令人困惑,如果使用不当,其应用价值也会受到限制。此外,目前和未来的治疗方法将需要对黑色素瘤进行分子分类,归入几个不同的亚型,以进行针对特定患者的治疗。了解不同的分子标志物可以预测什么和不能预测什么是至关重要的。我们讨论了基因突变分析和染色体的获得/丢失,以帮助阐明病理学中这个不断发展和令人困惑的方面。