Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Physiother. 2014 Mar;60(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
In children with cerebral palsy, does a 6-month physical activity stimulation program improve physical activity, mobility capacity, fitness, fatigue and attitude towards sports more than usual paediatric physiotherapy?
Multicentre randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessments and intention-to-treat analysis.
Forty-nine walking children (28 males) aged 7-13 years with spastic cerebral palsy and severity of the disability classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System level I-III.
The intervention group followed a 6-month physical activity stimulation program involving counselling through motivational interviewing, home-based physiotherapy, and 4 months of fitness training. The control group continued their usual paediatric physiotherapy.
Primary outcomes were walking activity (assessed objectively with an activity monitor) and parent-reported physical activity (Activity QUESTIONnaire for Adults and Adolescents). Secondary outcomes were: mobility capacity, consisting of Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), walking capacity and functional strength, fitness (aerobic and anaerobic capacity, muscle strength), self-reported fatigue, and attitude towards sport (child and parent). Assessments were performed at baseline, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months.
There were no significant intervention effects for physical activity or secondary outcomes at any assessment time. Positive trends were found for parent-reported time at moderate-to-vigorous intensity (between-group change ratio=2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and GMFM-66 (mean between-group difference=2.8 points, 95% CI 0.2 to 5.4) at 6 months, but not at 12 months. There was a trend for a small, but clinically irrelevant, improvement in the children's attitudes towards the disadvantages of sports at 6 months, and towards the advantages of sports at 12 months.
This physical activity stimulation program, that combined fitness training, counselling and home-based therapy, was not effective in children with cerebral palsy. Further research should examine the potential of each component of the intervention for improving physical activity in this population.
NTR2099.
在脑瘫儿童中,与常规儿科物理治疗相比,为期 6 个月的身体活动刺激计划是否能更多地提高身体活动、移动能力、体能、疲劳和对运动的态度?
多中心随机对照试验,采用隐蔽分组、盲法评估和意向治疗分析。
49 名 7-13 岁能行走的脑瘫儿童(男 28 名),残疾严重程度按粗大运动功能分类系统分级为 I-III 级。
干预组接受为期 6 个月的身体活动刺激计划,包括通过动机访谈进行咨询、家庭为基础的物理治疗以及 4 个月的体能训练。对照组继续接受常规儿科物理治疗。
主要结局是行走活动(通过活动监测器客观评估)和家长报告的身体活动(成人和青少年活动问卷)。次要结局包括:移动能力,由粗大运动功能测量-66(GMFM-66)、行走能力和功能力量、体能(有氧和无氧能力、肌肉力量)、自我报告的疲劳以及对运动的态度(儿童和家长)组成。评估在基线、4 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时进行。
在任何评估时间,身体活动或次要结局均无显著干预效果。在 6 个月时,家长报告的中等到剧烈强度时间有积极趋势(组间变化比=2.2,95%CI 1.1 至 4.4)和 GMFM-66(平均组间差异=2.8 分,95%CI 0.2 至 5.4),但在 12 个月时没有。在 6 个月时,儿童对运动劣势的态度以及在 12 个月时对运动优势的态度有改善的趋势,但改善幅度较小,临床意义不大。
该身体活动刺激计划结合了体能训练、咨询和家庭为基础的治疗,对脑瘫儿童无效。进一步的研究应该检查干预措施的每个组成部分对改善该人群身体活动的潜力。
NTR2099。