International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
J Physiother. 2014 Mar;60(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Do people with stroke spend more time in active task practice during circuit class therapy sessions versus individual physiotherapy sessions? Do people with stroke practise different tasks during circuit class therapy sessions versus individual physiotherapy sessions?
Prospective, observational study.
Twenty-nine people with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation settings.
Individual therapy sessions and circuit class therapy sessions provided within a larger randomised controlled trial.
Seventy-nine therapy sessions were video-recorded and the footage was analysed for time spent engaged in various categories of activity. In a subsample of 28 videos, the number of steps taken by people with stroke per therapy session was counted.
Circuit class therapy sessions were of a longer duration (mean difference 38.0minutes, 95% CI 29.9 to 46.1), and participants spent more time engaged in active task practice (mean difference 23.8minutes, 95% CI 16.1 to 31.4) compared with individual sessions. A greater percentage of time in circuit class therapy sessions was spent practising tasks in sitting (mean difference 5.3%, 95% CI 2.4 to 8.2) and in sit-to-stand practice (mean difference 2.7%, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.1), and a lower percentage of time in walking practice (mean difference 19.1%, 95% CI 10.0 to 28.1) compared with individual sessions. PARTICIPANTS took an average of 371 steps (SD 418) during therapy sessions and this did not differ significantly between group and individual sessions.
People with stroke spent more time in active task practice, but a similar amount of time in walking practice when physiotherapy was offered in circuit class therapy sessions versus individual therapy sessions. There is a need for effective strategies to increase the amount of walking practice during physiotherapy sessions for people after stroke.
与个体物理治疗相比,中风患者在团体治疗课程的治疗过程中是否会花费更多时间进行主动任务练习?与个体物理治疗相比,中风患者在团体治疗课程中是否会练习不同的任务?
前瞻性观察研究。
29 名在住院康复环境中的中风患者。
在更大的随机对照试验中提供个体治疗课程和团体治疗课程。
对 79 次治疗课程进行录像,对各种活动类别的活动时间进行分析。在 28 个视频的子样本中,计算中风患者每次治疗课程所走的步数。
团体治疗课程的持续时间更长(平均差异 38.0 分钟,95%置信区间 29.9 至 46.1),与个体课程相比,参与者在主动任务练习中花费的时间更多(平均差异 23.8 分钟,95%置信区间 16.1 至 31.4)。团体治疗课程中,坐姿练习(平均差异 5.3%,95%置信区间 2.4 至 8.2)和坐站练习(平均差异 2.7%,95%置信区间 1.4 至 4.1)的时间比例更高,步行练习的时间比例更低(平均差异 19.1%,95%置信区间 10.0 至 28.1)。与个体课程相比。参与者在治疗过程中平均走 371 步(SD 418),组间和个体课程之间没有显著差异。
与个体物理治疗相比,中风患者在团体治疗课程中进行主动任务练习的时间更多,但在团体治疗课程和个体治疗课程中进行步行练习的时间相似。对于中风后患者,需要有效的策略来增加物理治疗过程中的步行练习量。