Nagaveni S Aspalli, Balakoti K Reddy, Smita Karan, Ratnakar P, Satish S V, Aravind T
Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, AME's Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bijangere Road, Raichur-584103, Karnataka, India, e-mail:
Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, St Joseph Dental College and Hospital, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Nov 1;14(6):1065-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1452.
The apical extrusion of infected debris may have the potential to disrupt the balance between microbial aggression and host defense, resulting in incidents of acute inflammation. During preparation, irrigants and debris, such as bacteria, dentin filings and necrotic tissue may be extruded into the periradicular region leading to periapical inflammation and postoperative flare ups. Using an instrumentation technique that minimizes apical extrusion would be beneficial to both the practitioner and patient. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the weight of debris and volume of irrigant extruded apically from extracted teeth in vitro after endodontic instrumentation using four different rotary root canal instrumentation systems.
Four groups of each 20 extracted mandibular premolars were instrumented using one of the four systems: ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)), Hero-shaper (MicroMega, Besancon, France), RaCe (FKG Dentaire, La-Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) and K3 (SybronEndo, West Collins, CA). Debris and irrigant extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected in preweighed test tubes. Volume of irrigant extruded was noted. The containers were stored in incubator at 70° for two days to evaporate the moisture. Weight of dry debris was noted.
Data was analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test at a significance of 0.001.
The results indicated that all of the instrumentation systems tested caused measurable apical extrusion of debris and irrigants. Higher extrusion was observed with Protaper system which was statistically significant with Hero-Shaper, RaCe and K3 systems. There were no statistical differences between Hero-shaper, K3 and RaCe systems (p < 0.05).
All instrumentation techniques apically extruded debris and irrigant. However, Hero-shaper, K3 and RaCe systems produced less extruded debris and irrigant than the Protaper system.
感染性碎屑的根尖挤出可能会破坏微生物侵袭与宿主防御之间的平衡,从而引发急性炎症。在根管预备过程中,冲洗液和碎屑,如细菌、牙本质碎屑和坏死组织,可能会被挤出到根尖周区域,导致根尖周炎和术后疼痛加剧。采用能将根尖挤出量降至最低的根管预备技术,对医生和患者都有益处。本研究的目的是评估使用四种不同的旋转根管预备系统对拔除的牙齿进行根管预备后,在体外根尖挤出的碎屑重量和冲洗液体积。
每组20颗拔除的下颌前磨牙,分别使用以下四种系统之一进行预备:ProTaper Universal(登士柏迈福,瑞士巴拉格)、Hero-shaper(法国微动公司,贝桑松)、RaCe(瑞士FKG牙科器械公司,拉绍德封)和K3(美国SybronEndo公司,西柯林斯)。预备过程中从根尖孔挤出的碎屑和冲洗液收集在预先称重的试管中。记录挤出冲洗液的体积。将容器在70°的培养箱中保存两天以蒸发水分。记录干燥碎屑的重量。
采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平为0.001。
结果表明,所有测试的根管预备系统都会导致碎屑和冲洗液出现可测量的根尖挤出。观察到ProTaper系统的挤出量更高,与Hero-Shaper、RaCe和K3系统相比具有统计学显著性。Hero-shaper、K3和RaCe系统之间无统计学差异(p < 0.05)。
所有根管预备技术都会根尖挤出碎屑和冲洗液。然而,Hero-shaper、K3和RaCe系统产生的挤出碎屑和冲洗液比ProTaper系统少。