Sawka Carol, Ross Jillian, Srigley John, Irish Jonathan
Vice president of clinical programs and quality initiatives, Cancer Care Ontario; co-chair of the CCO Clinical Council; and professor of medicine, health policy, management and evaluation and public health sciences, University of Toronto.
Cancer Care Ontario's provincial clinical lead for the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Program; and professor, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University.
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:38-41. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.23157.
In 2004, Cancer Care Ontario's (CCO) role changed from providing direct cancer service to oversight, with a mission to improve the performance of the cancer system by driving quality, accountability and innovation in all cancer-related services. Since then, CCO has built a model for province-wide quality improvement and oversight--the Performance Improvement Cycle--that exemplifies the key elements of the Excellent Care for All Act, 2010. While ensuring that quality of the cancer system is by necessity a continuous process, the approach taken thus far has achieved measurable results and will continue to form the basis of CCO's future work. Clinician engagement has been critical to the success of CCO's approach to quality oversight and improvement. CCO uses a variety of formal and informal clinical engagement structures at each step of the Performance Improvement Cycle, and has developed operational processes to support quality improvement, and educational and mentorship programs to build clinician leadership capacity in that area. An example of sustained quality improvement in system performance is illustrated in a case study of the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. The improvement was achieved with strong collaboration across CCO's surgery and pathology clinical programs, with support from informatics staff.
2004年,安大略癌症护理组织(CCO)的角色从提供直接癌症服务转变为监督,其使命是通过推动所有癌症相关服务的质量、问责制和创新来提高癌症系统的绩效。自那时以来,CCO建立了一个全省范围的质量改进和监督模式——绩效改进周期,该模式体现了2010年《全民优质护理法案》的关键要素。在确保癌症系统质量必然是一个持续过程的同时,迄今为止所采用的方法已经取得了可衡量的成果,并将继续构成CCO未来工作的基础。临床医生的参与对于CCO质量监督和改进方法的成功至关重要。CCO在绩效改进周期的每个步骤都使用了各种正式和非正式的临床参与结构,并制定了支持质量改进的运营流程,以及培养临床医生在该领域领导能力的教育和指导计划。前列腺癌手术治疗的案例研究说明了系统绩效持续质量改进的一个例子。在信息学工作人员的支持下,通过CCO的外科和病理学临床项目之间的强有力合作实现了改进。