Suppr超能文献

一份用于评估肿瘤学家在晚期癌症患者常规护理中症状管理表现的病历审查清单的开发与验证

Development and validation of a medical chart review checklist for symptom management performance of oncologists in the routine care of patients with advanced cancer.

作者信息

Blum David, Rosa Daniel, deWolf-Linder Susanne, Hayoz Stefanie, Ribi Karin, Koeberle Dieter, Strasser Florian

机构信息

Oncological Palliative Medicine, Section Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Palliative Care Centre, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland; European Palliative Care Research Center, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Oncological Palliative Medicine, Section Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Palliative Care Centre, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 23.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Oncologists perform a range of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to manage the symptoms of outpatients with advanced cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop and test a symptom management performance checklist (SyMPeC) to review medical charts.

METHODS

First, the content of the checklist was determined by consensus of an interprofessional team. The SyMPeC was tested using the data set of the SAKK 96/06 E-MOSAIC (Electronical Monitoring of Symptoms and Syndromes Associated with Cancer) trial, which included six consecutive visits from 247 patients. In a test data set (half of the data) of medical charts, two people extracted and quantified the definitions of the parameters (content validity). To assess the inter-rater reliability, three independent researchers used the SyMPeC on a random sample (10% of the test data set), and Fleiss's kappa was calculated. To test external validity, the interventions retrieved by the SyMPeC chart review were compared with nurse-led assessment of patient-perceived oncologists' palliative interventions.

RESULTS

Five categories of symptoms were included: pain, fatigue, anorexia/nausea, dyspnea, and depression/anxiety. Interventions were categorized as symptom specific or symptom unspecific. In the test data set of 123 patients, 402 unspecific and 299 symptom-specific pharmacological interventions were detected. Nonpharmacological interventions (n = 242) were mostly symptom unspecific. Fleiss's kappa for symptom and intervention detections was K = 0.7 and K = 0.86, respectively. In 1003 of 1167 visits (86%), there was a match between SyMPeC and nurse-led assessment. Seventy-nine percent (195 of 247) of patients had no or one mismatch.

CONCLUSION

Chart review by SyMPeC seems reliable to detect symptom management interventions by oncologists in outpatient clinics. Nonpharmacological interventions were less symptom specific. A template for documentation is needed for standardization.

摘要

背景

肿瘤学家实施一系列药物和非药物干预措施来管理晚期癌症门诊患者的症状。

目的

本研究旨在开发并测试一种症状管理绩效清单(SyMPeC),用于审查病历。

方法

首先,由一个跨专业团队通过共识确定清单内容。使用SAKK 96/06 E-MOSAIC(癌症相关症状和综合征的电子监测)试验的数据集对SyMPeC进行测试,该试验包括247例患者的连续6次就诊。在病历的测试数据集(数据的一半)中,两人提取并量化参数定义(内容效度)。为评估评分者间信度,三名独立研究人员在随机样本(测试数据集的10%)上使用SyMPeC,并计算Fleiss卡方值。为测试外部效度,将SyMPeC病历审查检索到的干预措施与护士主导的患者对肿瘤学家姑息干预措施的评估进行比较。

结果

纳入了五类症状:疼痛、疲劳、厌食/恶心、呼吸困难和抑郁/焦虑。干预措施分为症状特异性或非特异性。在123例患者的测试数据集中,检测到402项非特异性和299项症状特异性药物干预措施。非药物干预措施(n = 242)大多是非特异性症状。症状和干预措施检测的Fleiss卡方值分别为K = 0.7和K = 0.86。在1167次就诊中的1003次(86%)中,SyMPeC与护士主导的评估结果相符。79%(247例中的195例)的患者没有或只有一次不相符。

结论

SyMPeC进行病历审查似乎可可靠地检测门诊肿瘤学家的症状管理干预措施。非药物干预措施的症状特异性较低。需要一个记录模板来实现标准化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验