Levitt Cheryl, Chen Xingchen, Hilts Linda, Dolovich Lisa, Price David, Nair Kalpana
Professor in the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, in Hamilton, Ontario. She co-authored the Quality in Family Practice Book of Tools with Linda Hilts. She can be contacted at 905-525-9140, ext. 28500.
Bachelor of health sciences student and was a summer student in the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University when this manuscript was written.
Healthc Q. 2013;16(1):39-46.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) framework has been used frequently to assess and monitor quality in secondary and tertiary care, but not in primary care. This article describes and proposes a conceptual framework for categorizing primary care indicators that align with the IOM's six aims for quality in healthcare performance (Safe, Effective, Patient-Centred, Timely, Efficient and Equitable.) Using an iterative process, the authors developed and compared a primary care framework for categorizing indicators in the Quality in Family Practice Book of Tools (QBT) with the IOM aims and other local healthcare systems frameworks (Integrated and Continuous, Appropriate Practice Resources). They also compared, cross-matched and analyzed their QBT categories and indicators with other international primary care assessment tools. And they compared the QBT titles and descriptions of groups of indicators with those published in the international tools.
医学研究所(IOM)框架经常被用于评估和监测二级及三级医疗服务的质量,但未用于初级医疗服务。本文描述并提出了一个概念框架,用于对与IOM医疗服务绩效的六个质量目标(安全、有效、以患者为中心、及时、高效和公平)相一致的初级医疗指标进行分类。作者采用迭代过程,开发并比较了《家庭医疗实践质量工具手册》(QBT)中用于指标分类的初级医疗框架与IOM目标以及其他地方医疗系统框架(综合与持续、适当的实践资源)。他们还将QBT类别和指标与其他国际初级医疗评估工具进行了比较、交叉匹配和分析。并且他们将QBT指标组的标题和描述与国际工具中公布的标题和描述进行了比较。