Peltola Mikko J, Bakermans-Kranenburg Marian J, Alink Lenneke R A, Huffmeijer Renske, Biro Szilvia, van IJzendoorn Marinus H
School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere, FIN-33014, Tampere, Finland; Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 Sep;56(6):1377-89. doi: 10.1002/dev.21223. Epub 2014 May 27.
Asymmetry of frontal cortical electroencephalogram (EEG) activity in children is influenced by the social environment and considered a marker of vulnerability to emotional and behavioral problems. To determine the reliability of these associations, we used meta-analysis to test whether variation in resting frontal EEG asymmetry is consistently associated with (a) having experienced psychosocial risk (e.g., parental depression or maltreatment) and (b) internalizing and externalizing behavior outcomes in children ranging from newborns to adolescents. Three meta-analyses including 38 studies (N = 2,523) and 50 pertinent effect sizes were carried out. The studies included in the analyses reported associations between frontal EEG asymmetry and psychosocial risk (k = 20; predominantly studies with maternal depression as the risk factor) as well as internalizing (k = 20) and externalizing (k = 10) behavior outcomes. Psychosocial risk was significantly associated with greater relative right frontal asymmetry, with an effect size of d = .36 (p < .01), the effects being stronger in girls. A non-significant relation was observed between right frontal asymmetry and internalizing symptoms (d = .19, p = .08), whereas no association between left frontal asymmetry and externalizing symptoms was observed (d = .04, p = .79). Greater relative right frontal asymmetry appears to be a fairly consistent marker of the presence of familial stressors in children but the power of frontal asymmetry to directly predict emotional and behavioral problems is modest.
儿童额叶皮质脑电图(EEG)活动的不对称性受社会环境影响,并被视为易患情绪和行为问题的一个标志。为了确定这些关联的可靠性,我们使用荟萃分析来检验静息额叶脑电图不对称性的变化是否始终与以下因素相关:(a)经历过心理社会风险(例如,父母抑郁或虐待),以及(b)从新生儿到青少年的儿童内化和外化行为结果。我们进行了三项荟萃分析,包括38项研究(N = 2523)和50个相关效应量。分析中纳入的研究报告了额叶脑电图不对称性与心理社会风险(k = 20;主要是以母亲抑郁为风险因素的研究)以及内化(k = 20)和外化(k = 10)行为结果之间的关联。心理社会风险与相对右侧额叶更大的不对称性显著相关,效应量为d = 0.36(p < 0.01),女孩中的效应更强。右侧额叶不对称性与内化症状之间观察到无显著关系(d = 0.19,p = 0.08),而左侧额叶不对称性与外化症状之间未观察到关联(d = 0.04,p = 0.79)。相对右侧额叶更大的不对称性似乎是儿童存在家庭应激源的一个相当一致的标志,但额叶不对称性直接预测情绪和行为问题的能力较弱。