Suppr超能文献

哌甲酯对神经认知测试组的影响:根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版亚型进行的评估。

Effect of methylphenidate on neurocognitive test battery: an evaluation according to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, subtypes.

作者信息

Durak Sibel, Ercan Eyup Sabri, Ardic Ulku Akyol, Yuce Deniz, Ercan Elif, Ipci Melis

机构信息

From the *Behcet Uz State Hospital and †Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir; ‡Department of Preventive Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara; and §Department of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Ege University Faculty of Education; ∥Department of Psychology, Ege University Faculty of Literature, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Aug;34(4):467-74. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000128.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the neuropsychological characteristics of the restrictive (R) subtype according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition and the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) combined (CB) type and predominantly inattentive (PI) type subtypes and to evaluate whether methylphenidate (MPH) affects neurocognitive test battery scores according to these subtypes. This study included 360 children and adolescents (277 boys, 83 girls) between 7 and 15 years of age who had been diagnosed with ADHD and compared the neuropsychological characteristics and MPH treatment responses of patients with the R subtype-which has been suggested for inclusion among the ADHD subtypes in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-with those of patients with the PI and CB subtypes. They did not differ from the control subjects in the complex attention domain, which includes Continuous Performance Test, Stroop test, and Shifting Attention Test, which suggests that the R subtype displayed a lower level of deterioration in these domains compared with the PI and CB subtypes. The patients with the CB and PI subtypes did not differ from the control subjects in the Continuous Performance Test correct response domain, whereas those with the R subtype presented a poorer performance than the control subjects. The R subtype requires a more detailed evaluation because it presented similar results in the remaining neuropsychological evaluations and MPH responses.

摘要

本研究的目的是根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版评估限制型(R)亚型、注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)混合型(CB)和主要注意力不集中型(PI)亚型的神经心理学特征,并评估哌甲酯(MPH)是否会根据这些亚型影响神经认知测试组合分数。本研究纳入了360名7至15岁已被诊断为ADHD的儿童和青少年(277名男孩,83名女孩),并比较了被建议纳入《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版ADHD亚型中的R亚型患者与PI和CB亚型患者的神经心理学特征及MPH治疗反应。在包括连续性能测试、斯特鲁普测试和注意力转移测试的复杂注意力领域,他们与对照组受试者没有差异,这表明与PI和CB亚型相比,R亚型在这些领域的衰退水平较低。CB和PI亚型患者在连续性能测试正确反应领域与对照组受试者没有差异,而R亚型患者的表现比对照组受试者差。R亚型需要更详细的评估,因为它在其余神经心理学评估和MPH反应中呈现出相似的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验