de la Peña Ike C, Pan Michael C, Thai Chau Giang, Alisso Tamara
Department of Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.
Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Brain Sci. 2020 May 14;10(5):292. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10050292.
Research on the predominantly inattentive attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-PI) subtype/presentation is important given its high prevalence, but paradoxically it is under-recognized and undertreated. The temporal stability of the inattention symptom could impact the high worldwide prevalence of ADHD-PI. Some evidence suggests differences in the nature of attentional deficit in ADHD-PI vs. that in other subtypes. Impairments in neuropsychological, neurocognitive, and social functioning are also evident in ADHD-PI, which could be specific to the subtype (e.g., processing speed, social perception, and skills), or differ from others in severity. Neuroimaging studies have also revealed ADHD-PI-specific neuropathological abnormalities and those that are shared with other subtypes. ADHD-PI is highly comorbid with learning and internalizing (e.g., anxiety and depression) disorders. There is no solid evidence for ADHD-PI-specific genetic etiologies and differential responses of subtypes to ADHD medications. Translational studies have used the Wistar Kyoto/NCrl substrain which requires further characterizations as an ADHD-PI model. Overall, ADHD-PI research has been conducted in the context of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, which arguably does not conform to the widely recognized "dimensional" view of ADHD. The Research Domain Criteria has been proposed to provide a novel framework for understanding the nature of neuropsychiatric illnesses and ultimately improve their diagnosis and treatment.
对以注意力不集中为主型注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD-PI)亚型/表现的研究很重要,因为其患病率很高,但矛盾的是,它未得到充分认识和治疗。注意力不集中症状的时间稳定性可能会影响ADHD-PI在全球的高患病率。一些证据表明,ADHD-PI与其他亚型在注意力缺陷的性质上存在差异。ADHD-PI在神经心理学、神经认知和社会功能方面的损害也很明显,这些损害可能是该亚型特有的(例如,处理速度、社会认知和技能),或者在严重程度上与其他亚型不同。神经影像学研究也揭示了ADHD-PI特有的神经病理异常以及与其他亚型共有的异常。ADHD-PI与学习障碍和内化障碍(如焦虑和抑郁)高度共病。目前尚无确凿证据表明ADHD-PI有特定的遗传病因,也没有证据表明各亚型对ADHD药物有不同反应。转化研究使用了Wistar Kyoto/NCrl亚系,但作为ADHD-PI模型还需要进一步表征。总体而言,ADHD-PI的研究是在《诊断与统计手册》的背景下进行的,而该手册可以说不符合广泛认可的ADHD“维度”观点。研究领域标准已被提出,以提供一个新的框架来理解神经精神疾病的本质,并最终改善其诊断和治疗。