Gehlert Rick J, Xing Zhiqing, DeCoster Thomas A
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2014 Summer;23(2):75-82. doi: 10.3113/jsoa.2014.0075.
Pelvic crescent fracture, also known as sacroiliac fracture-dislocation, is traditionally considered as a lateral compression injury and a vertically stable injury. Thirty consecutive cases were analyzed and it was found that 63% of cases were caused by lateral compression (LC), 27% by anteroposterior compression (APC), and 10% by vertical shear (VS). APC and VS injuries cause significant displacement of the anterior iliac fragment, but 21% of LC injury cases showed minimal displacement and were treated successfully with nonoperative treatment. Different injury mechanisms also produce different types of pelvic instability. More important, different injury mechanisms produce distinct radiographic fracture patterns regarding the obliquity of the fracture line and fracture surface. These differences in the fracture pattern will influence the decision of internal fixation options. Therefore, treatment of pelvic crescent fractures should be based on individual analysis of injury mechanism and radiographic fracture pattern.
骨盆新月形骨折,也称为骶髂关节骨折脱位,传统上被认为是一种侧方压缩损伤且垂直方向稳定的损伤。对连续30例病例进行分析后发现,63%的病例由侧方压缩(LC)导致,27%由前后压缩(APC)导致,10%由垂直剪切(VS)导致。APC和VS损伤会导致髂骨前部骨折块明显移位,但21%的LC损伤病例移位极小,采用非手术治疗获得成功。不同的损伤机制也会产生不同类型的骨盆不稳定。更重要的是,不同的损伤机制会产生关于骨折线和骨折面倾斜度的不同影像学骨折类型。骨折类型的这些差异会影响内固定选择的决策。因此,骨盆新月形骨折的治疗应基于对损伤机制和影像学骨折类型的个体化分析。