• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族效应。

The race effect.

作者信息

Yuge J, Cecka J M

出版信息

Clin Transpl. 1989:407-16.

PMID:2487609
Abstract
  1. One-year graft survival rates were 93% for recipients of HLA-identical sibling transplants in Blacks and Caucasians. One-year graft survival rates were lower in Blacks than Caucasians by 6% for parent donor, 8% for first cadaver, and 4% for cadaver donor retransplants between 1984 and 1989. 2. Although 1-year graft survival was consistently lower in Black recipients, there was no significant race difference when the recipient was over age 45 years. In transplants performed after 1986, there was no significant race difference when the recipient was over age 30 years. 3. Black recipients aged 15-30 years had the poorest 1-year graft survival at 64% each year between 1984 and 1988. One-year graft survival in comparable Caucasian recipients improved from 73-82% during this interval. The difference was greatest (18%) when comparing young Black and Caucasian males. 4. Caucasians had better early function than Blacks as judged from serum creatinine levels in the first 60 days. Fifty-two percent of Caucasians had excellent function (SCr less than 1.5 mg/dl) vs 37% of Blacks. Conversely, 22% of Blacks had SCr levels that never fell below 2.5 mg/dl vs 16% of Caucasians. There was no racial difference in early graft survival when transplants were stratified by function. The race effect became apparent after 6-12 months. 5. Long-term graft survival continues to differ dramatically between Black and Caucasian recipients. Transplant half-lives were consistently 4 years among Black and 7.5 years among Caucasian recipients of first cadaver transplants. Even comparing HLA-identical sibling transplants, the late loss rate in Blacks was double that in Caucasians. 6. The transplant center was an important factor in the race effect. Blacks transplanted at centers with overall high success rates had 79% 1-year graft survival, not significantly lower than that of Caucasian recipients. As the overall success rates declined at good and fair centers, the difference in 1-year graft survival between Black and Caucasian recipients increased from 8% to 12%. 7. The transplant center did not influence long-term graft survival in Black recipients. Transplant half-lives ranged from 4.9-3.9 years at excellent and fair centers, respectively. 8. The difference in graft survival between Caucasian and Black donors was primarily a center effect. In transplants to Caucasian recipients, there was no difference between Caucasian and Black donors at excellent and good centers, and a 16% difference at fair centers.
摘要
  1. 黑人与白人接受 HLA 相同的同胞移植受者的 1 年移植物存活率均为 93%。1984 年至 1989 年期间,黑人接受父母供体移植的 1 年移植物存活率比白人低 6%,接受首例尸体供体移植的低 8%,接受尸体供体重移植的低 4%。2. 尽管黑人受者的 1 年移植物存活率一直较低,但 45 岁以上的受者中不存在显著的种族差异。在 1986 年之后进行的移植中,30 岁以上的受者中也不存在显著的种族差异。3. 1984 年至 1988 年期间,年龄在 15 - 30 岁的黑人受者 1 年移植物存活率最差,每年为 64%。在此期间,年龄相仿的白人受者 1 年移植物存活率从 73%提高到 82%。比较年轻黑人男性和白人男性时差异最大(18%)。4. 从前 60 天的血清肌酐水平判断,白人的早期功能比黑人好。52%的白人功能极佳(血清肌酐低于 1.5mg/dl),而黑人中这一比例为 37%。相反,22%的黑人血清肌酐水平从未降至 2.5mg/dl 以下,白人中这一比例为 16%。按功能分层移植时,早期移植物存活率不存在种族差异。种族效应在 6 - 12 个月后显现。5. 黑人与白人受者的长期移植物存活率仍存在显著差异。首例尸体移植的黑人受者移植物半衰期始终为四年,白人受者为 7.5 年。即使比较 HLA 相同的同胞移植,黑人的后期丢失率也是白人的两倍。6. 移植中心是种族效应中的一个重要因素。在总体成功率高的中心接受移植的黑人,其 1 年移植物存活率为 79%,与白人受者相比无显著降低。随着优质和中等中心的总体成功率下降,黑人与白人受者 1 年移植物存活率的差异从 8%增至 12%。7. 移植中心不影响黑人受者的长期移植物存活率。在优秀和中等中心,移植物半衰期分别为 4.9 年至 3.9 年。8. 白人供体与黑人供体移植物存活率的差异主要是中心效应。在移植给白人受者时,优秀和优质中心的白人供体与黑人供体之间无差异,在中等中心差异为 16%。

相似文献

1
The race effect.种族效应。
Clin Transpl. 1989:407-16.
2
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--2000.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处——2000年
Clin Transpl. 2000:1-18.
3
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1996:1-14.
4
The UNOS renal transplant registry.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 2001:1-18.
5
The UNOS scientific renal transplant registry. United Network for Organ Sharing.美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1995:1-18.
6
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1998:1-16.
7
Living donor transplants.活体供体移植。
Clin Transpl. 1995:363-77.
8
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1992:1-16.
9
Effect of race on kidney transplants.种族对肾移植的影响。
Clin Transpl. 1990:447-59.
10
The roles of sex, race, and ABO groups.
Clin Transpl. 1986:199-221.