Highfield Linda, Bartholomew L Kay, Hartman Marieke A, Ford M Molly, Balihe Philomene
University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Nov;15(6):904-14. doi: 10.1177/1524839914534685. Epub 2014 May 29.
When community health planners select an evidence-based intervention that has been developed and tested in one situation and adapt it for use in a different situation or community, best practice suggests needs assessment and formative research in the new setting. Cancer prevention planners who are interested in adopting and adapting evidence-based approaches need to base their choices on a sound understanding of the health or behavioral risk problem in which they mean to intervene. This requires a balancing act of weighing community information against a broader perspective from the scientific literature and using the combination to identify and adapt an evidence-based intervention program that is likely to be effective in the new setting. This report is a case study of a community and organizational assessment conducted as a foundation for selecting and recommending adaptation of an evidence-based intervention for improving mammography appointment attendance. We used an inductive sequential exploratory mixed-methods design to inform this process. The process provides a model for formative research grounding evidence-based practice for cancer control planners. Future studies that incorporate findings from needs assessment into the adaptation of the selected intervention program may promote the effective dissemination of evidence-based programs.
当社区健康规划者选择一种在某一情境中已开发并经过测试的循证干预措施,并对其进行调整以用于不同的情境或社区时,最佳实践建议在新环境中进行需求评估和形成性研究。对采用和调整循证方法感兴趣的癌症预防规划者,需要在对他们打算干预的健康或行为风险问题有充分理解的基础上做出选择。这需要在权衡社区信息与科学文献中更广泛的观点之间取得平衡,并利用两者的结合来确定和调整一个在新环境中可能有效的循证干预项目。本报告是一个社区和组织评估的案例研究,该评估作为选择和推荐调整循证干预措施以提高乳房X光检查预约就诊率的基础。我们采用归纳式顺序探索性混合方法设计为这一过程提供信息。该过程为癌症控制规划者将循证实践建立在形成性研究基础上提供了一个模型。将需求评估结果纳入所选干预项目调整的未来研究,可能会促进循证项目的有效传播。