Hornbeck Amaury, Garcia Tristan, Cuttat Marguerite, Jenny Catherine
CEA, LIST, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France.
Radiotherapy Department, Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Med Phys. 2014 Jun;41(6):061708. doi: 10.1118/1.4873686.
Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife(®) (LGK) is a radiotherapy beam machine whose features are not compliant with the international calibration protocols for radiotherapy. In this scope, the Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel and the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital decided to conceive a new LKG dose calibration method and to compare it with the currently used one. Furthermore, the accuracy of the dose delivered by the LGK machine was checked using an "end-to-end" test. This study also aims to compare doses delivered by the two latest software versions of the Gammaplan treatment planning system (TPS).
The dosimetric method chosen is the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of alanine. Dose rate (calibration) verification was done without TPS using a spherical phantom. Absolute calibration was done with factors calculated by Monte Carlo simulation (MCNP-X). For "end-to-end" test, irradiations in an anthropomorphic head phantom, close to real treatment conditions, are done using the TPS in order to verify the delivered dose.
The comparison of the currently used calibration method with the new one revealed a deviation of +0.8% between the dose rates measured by ion chamber and EPR/alanine. For simple fields configuration (less than 16 mm diameter), the "end-to-end" tests showed out average deviations of -1.7% and -0.9% between the measured dose and the calculated dose by Gammaplan v9 and v10, respectively.
This paper shows there is a good agreement between the new calibration method and the currently used one. There is also a good agreement between the calculated and delivered doses especially for Gammaplan v10.
医科达Leksell伽玛刀(LGK)是一种放射治疗束机器,其特性不符合放射治疗的国际校准协议。在此范围内,法国国家亨利·贝克勒尔实验室和皮提耶-萨尔佩特里尔医院决定构思一种新的LKG剂量校准方法,并将其与当前使用的方法进行比较。此外,使用“端到端”测试检查了LGK机器输送剂量的准确性。本研究还旨在比较伽玛计划治疗计划系统(TPS)的两个最新软件版本输送的剂量。
选择的剂量测定方法是丙氨酸的电子顺磁共振(EPR)。使用球形体模在不使用TPS的情况下进行剂量率(校准)验证。使用蒙特卡罗模拟(MCNP-X)计算的因子进行绝对校准。对于“端到端”测试,在接近实际治疗条件的人体头部体模中进行照射,使用TPS来验证输送的剂量。
将当前使用的校准方法与新方法进行比较,结果显示电离室和EPR/丙氨酸测量的剂量率之间存在+0.8%的偏差。对于简单的射野配置(直径小于16毫米),“端到端”测试显示,伽玛计划v9和v10测量剂量与计算剂量之间的平均偏差分别为-1.7%和-0.9%。
本文表明新校准方法与当前使用的方法之间有良好的一致性。计算剂量与输送剂量之间也有良好的一致性,尤其是对于伽玛计划v10。