Ruiz Andres D, Daniels Kelly R
Int J Pharm Compd. 2014 Jan-Feb;18(1):70-7.
Prior studies demonstrated improved menopausal symptom relief following treatment with compounded bioidentical hormone replacement therapy; however, clinical effectiveness studies evaluating different routes of bioidentical hormone replacement therapy administration are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of sublingual and topical compounded bioidentical hormone replacement therapy for the treatment of vasomotor, mood, and other quality-of-life symptoms in post-menopausal women. This was a prospective, observational cohort study of women > or = 18 years of age who received a compounded sublingual or topical bioidentical hormone replacement therapy preparation between January 1, 2003 and October 1, 2010 in a community pharmacy. Data collection included patient demographics, comorbidities, hormone regimens, and therapeutic outcomes. Patients rated their vasomotor, mood, and quality-of-life symptoms as absent, mild, moderate, or severe at baseline, at one to three months follow-up, and three to six months follow-up. Baseline characteristics were compared using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Symptom intensity between baseline and follow-up periods were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A total of 200 patients met study criteria; 160 received topical bioidentical hormone replacement therapy, and 40 received sublingual bioidentical hormone replacement therapy. Most sublingually-treated patients (70%) received an estrogen combination and 100% received progesterone. Nearly half (43%) of the topically treated patients received an estrogen combination (43%) and 99% received progesterone. The percentage of sublingually treated patients reporting "moderate" or "severe" symptoms was significantly reduced at one to three months follow-up for the following target symptoms: hot flashes (31%, P = 0.04), night sweats (38%, P < 0.01), irritability (36%, P = 0.01), anxiety (42%, P < 0.01), emotional lability (38%, P < 0.01), sleep disturbances (35%, P < 0.01), memory loss (35%, P = 0.04), fatigue (33%, P = 0.04), and libido (26%, P = 0.03). Similar reductions were seen at three to six months follow-up compared to baseline. Patients who received topical therapy did not experience significant symptom reductions at one to three months follow-up; however, significant symptom reduction was seen at three to six months for the following: emotional lability (31%, P < 0.01), irritability (29%, P = 0.02), and night sweats (20%, P = 0.04). Compounded sublingual bioidentical hormone replacement therapy is effective in reducing vasomotor, mood, and quality-of-life symptoms experienced in post-menopausal women. Topical therapy does not appear to improve symptoms as extensively or rapidly as sublingual therapy.
先前的研究表明,采用复方生物同源激素替代疗法进行治疗后,更年期症状得到了改善;然而,缺乏评估生物同源激素替代疗法不同给药途径的临床有效性研究。本研究的目的是确定舌下含服和局部应用复方生物同源激素替代疗法治疗绝经后女性血管舒缩、情绪及其他生活质量症状的有效性。这是一项前瞻性观察队列研究,研究对象为2003年1月1日至2010年10月1日期间在社区药房接受复方舌下含服或局部应用生物同源激素替代疗法制剂的18岁及以上女性。数据收集包括患者人口统计学信息、合并症、激素治疗方案及治疗结果。患者在基线、1至3个月随访以及3至6个月随访时,将其血管舒缩、情绪及生活质量症状评为无、轻度、中度或重度。分类变量的基线特征采用卡方检验进行比较,连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较。基线期和随访期之间的症状强度采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。共有200名患者符合研究标准;160名接受局部生物同源激素替代疗法,40名接受舌下含服生物同源激素替代疗法。大多数接受舌下含服治疗的患者(70%)接受雌激素联合治疗,100%接受孕激素治疗。近一半(43%)接受局部治疗的患者接受雌激素联合治疗,99%接受孕激素治疗。在1至3个月随访时,接受舌下含服治疗的患者报告“中度”或“重度”症状的百分比在以下目标症状方面显著降低:潮热(31%,P = 0.04)、盗汗(38%,P < 0.01)、易怒(36%,P = 0.01)、焦虑(42%,P < 0.01)、情绪不稳定(38%,P < 0.01)、睡眠障碍(35%,P < 0.01)、记忆力减退(35%,P = 0.04)、疲劳(33%,P = 0.04)和性欲(26%,P = 0.03)。与基线相比,在3至6个月随访时也出现了类似的降低。接受局部治疗的患者在1至3个月随访时症状未显著减轻;然而,在3至6个月时,以下症状出现了显著减轻:情绪不稳定(31%,P < 0.01)、易怒(29%,P = 0.02)和盗汗(20%,P = 0.04)。复方舌下含服生物同源激素替代疗法可有效减轻绝经后女性的血管舒缩、情绪及生活质量症状。局部治疗似乎不如舌下含服治疗那样能广泛或迅速地改善症状。