Dr. Fagin is a resident in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University; Dr. Howell is A. Lee Loomis Professor of Periodontology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine; Dr. Da Silva is Vice Dean, Harvard School of Dental Medicine; and Dr. Park is Assistant Dean for Dental Education, Harvard School of Dental Medicine.
J Dent Educ. 2014 Jun;78(6):813-22.
The purpose of this study was to assess how the change to pass/fail grading of the National Board Dental Examination (NBDE) Part I has impacted dental students' study habits and their perspectives on pursuit of postdoctoral specialty education. This cross-sectional survey-based study included over 75 percent of U.S. dental schools and a total of 1,843 responses. This sample was 18.5 percent of all potentially eligible U.S. dental students. Participating schools distributed the electronic survey to their last class to take the NBDE Part I for a numerical score and the first class to take the NBDE Part I pass/fail. Respondents who took the exam for a numerical score and were interested in a specialty reported studying the most (average 167 hours) compared to respondents who took the exam pass/fail (average 114 hours). Respondents who took the exam pass/fail and reported feeling that this change decreased their chances of getting into a specialty program outnumbered those who thought the change increased their chances (3:1). This study observed a correlation between the recent grading changes to the NBDE Part I and decreased reported study time. Eighty percent of the respondents preferred a standardized, objective measure to help differentiate them when applying to specialty programs, and the majority reported feeling that the change in grading practices negatively affected their chances of pursuing a specialty.
本研究旨在评估美国牙科考试委员会(NBDE)第一部分从计分制改为通过/不通过制对牙科学生学习习惯和他们对攻读专科后教育的看法的影响。这项基于横断面调查的研究涵盖了超过 75%的美国牙科学校和总共 1843 名受访者。该样本占所有符合条件的美国牙科学生的 18.5%。参与学校向他们最后一届参加 NBDE 第一部分考试的学生发放了数字分数的电子调查问卷,以及第一届参加 NBDE 第一部分考试的通过/不通过制的学生。与通过/不通过制考试的考生(平均 114 小时)相比,那些对专科感兴趣并参加了数字分数考试的考生(平均 167 小时)学习时间最长。认为这一变化降低了他们进入专科项目机会的考生人数多于认为这一变化增加了他们机会的考生人数(3:1)。本研究观察到 NBDE 第一部分近期评分变化与报告学习时间减少之间存在相关性。80%的受访者更喜欢标准化、客观的衡量标准,以帮助他们在申请专科项目时脱颖而出,大多数人表示,评分方式的改变对他们攻读专科的机会产生了负面影响。