Gomes Carlos Augusto, Junior Cleber Soares, Costa Evandro de Freitas Campos, Alves Paula de Assis Pereira, de Faria Carolina Vieira, Cangussu Igor Vitoi, Costa Luisa Pires, Gomes Camila Couto, Gomes Felipe Couto
Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario (HU) Terezinha de Jesus da Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas e da Saude de Juiz de Fora (SUPREMA), Brasil; Hospital Universitario (HU) Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Brasil.
Anestesiology Unit, Hospital Terezinha de Jesus da Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas e da Saude de Juiz de Fora (SUPREMA), Brasil.
J Clin Med Res. 2014 Aug;6(4):261-6. doi: 10.14740/jocmr1837w. Epub 2014 May 22.
Laparoscopy has not been consolidated as the approach of first choice in the management of complicated appendicitis. Methodological flaws and absence of disease stratification criteria have been implicated in that less evidence. The objective is to study the safe and effectiveness of laparoscopy in the management of complicated appendicitis according to laparoscopic grading system.
From January 2008 to January 2011, 154 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis were evaluated in the prospective way. The patient's age ranged from 12 to 75 years old (31.7 ± 13.3) and 58.3% were male. Complicated appendicitis refers to gangrenous and/or perforated appendix and were graded as 3A (segmental necrosis), 3B (base necrosis), 4A (abscess), 4B (regional peritonitis) and 5 (diffuse peritonitis). The outcomes including operative time, infection complication, operative complications and conversion rate were chosen to evaluate the procedure.
The grade 3A was the most frequent with 50 (32.4%) patients. The mean operative time was 69.4 ± 26.3 minutes. The grade 4A showed the highest mean operative time (80.1 ± 26.7 minutes). The wound and intra-abdominal infection rates were 2.6 and 4.6%, respectively. The base necrosis was the most important factor associated with the conversion (5.2%). The grades 4A and 5 were associated with greater possibility of intra-abdominal collection. There were no operative complications.
The laparoscopic management of all complicated grades of acute appendicitis is safe and effective and should be the procedure of first choice. The laparoscopic grading system allows us to assess patients in the same disease stage.
腹腔镜检查尚未成为复杂阑尾炎治疗的首选方法。方法学缺陷和缺乏疾病分层标准被认为是导致该证据不足的原因。目的是根据腹腔镜分级系统研究腹腔镜检查在复杂阑尾炎治疗中的安全性和有效性。
2008年1月至2011年1月,对154例因复杂阑尾炎接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的连续患者进行前瞻性评估。患者年龄在12至75岁之间(31.7±13.3),58.3%为男性。复杂阑尾炎指坏疽性和/或穿孔性阑尾,分为3A(节段性坏死)、3B(根部坏死)、4A(脓肿)、4B(局限性腹膜炎)和5(弥漫性腹膜炎)。选择包括手术时间、感染并发症、手术并发症和转化率等结果来评估该手术。
3A级最为常见,有50例(32.4%)患者。平均手术时间为69.4±26.3分钟。4A级的平均手术时间最长(80.1±26.7分钟)。伤口感染率和腹腔内感染率分别为2.6%和4.6%。根部坏死是与中转手术相关的最重要因素(5.2%)。4A级和5级与腹腔内积液的可能性更大相关。无手术并发症。
腹腔镜治疗所有复杂程度的急性阑尾炎是安全有效的,应作为首选手术方法。腹腔镜分级系统使我们能够在同一疾病阶段评估患者。