Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
BMC Oral Health. 2014 May 20;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-56.
The objective of this paper is to quantify the cost of periodontitis management at public sector specialist periodontal clinic settings and analyse the distribution of cost components.
Five specialist periodontal clinics in the Ministry of Health represented the public sector in providing clinical and cost data for this study. Newly-diagnosed periodontitis patients (N = 165) were recruited and followed up for one year of specialist periodontal care. Direct and indirect costs from the societal viewpoint were included in the cost analysis. They were measured in 2012 Ringgit Malaysia (MYR) and estimated from the societal perspective using activity-based and step-down costing methods, and substantiated by clinical pathways. Cost of dental equipment, consumables and labour (average treatment time) for each procedure was measured using activity-based costing method. Meanwhile, unit cost calculations for clinic administration, utilities and maintenance used step-down approach. Patient expenditures and absence from work were recorded via diary entries. The conversion from MYR to Euro was based on the 2012 rate (1€ = MYR4).
A total of 2900 procedures were provided, with an average cost of MYR 2820 (€705) per patient for the study year, and MYR 376 (€94) per outpatient visit. Out of this, 90% was contributed by provider cost and 10% by patient cost; 94% for direct cost and 4% for lost productivity. Treatment of aggressive periodontitis was significantly higher than for chronic periodontitis (t-test, P = 0.003). Higher costs were expended as disease severity increased (ANOVA, P = 0.022) and for patients requiring surgeries (ANOVA, P < 0.001). Providers generally spent most on consumables while patients spent most on transportation.
Cost of providing dental treatment for periodontitis patients at public sector specialist settings were substantial and comparable with some non-communicable diseases. These findings provide basis for identifying potential cost-reducing strategies, estimating economic burden of periodontitis management and performing economic evaluation of the specialist periodontal programme.
本文旨在量化公共部门专科牙周诊所牙周炎管理的成本,并分析成本构成的分布。
卫生部的五家专科牙周诊所代表公共部门提供了这项研究的临床和成本数据。新诊断的牙周炎患者(N=165)被招募并接受为期一年的专科牙周护理。从社会角度考虑了直接和间接成本。它们以 2012 年马来西亚林吉特(MYR)进行衡量,并使用基于活动和逐步降低的成本计算方法从社会角度进行估计,并通过临床路径进行证实。使用基于活动的成本计算方法测量每个程序的牙科设备、耗材和劳动力(平均治疗时间)的成本。同时,使用逐步降低的方法计算诊所管理、水电费和维护的单位成本。通过日记条目记录患者支出和缺勤情况。从 MYR 转换为欧元基于 2012 年的汇率(1€=MYR4)。
共提供了 2900 次治疗,每位患者在研究年内的平均治疗费用为 MYR 2820(€705),每次门诊就诊的费用为 MYR 376(€94)。其中,90%由提供者成本贡献,10%由患者成本贡献;94%为直接成本,4%为生产力损失。侵袭性牙周炎的治疗费用明显高于慢性牙周炎(t 检验,P=0.003)。随着疾病严重程度的增加(方差分析,P=0.022)和需要手术的患者(方差分析,P<0.001),成本支出也会增加。提供者通常在耗材上花费最多,而患者在交通上花费最多。
在公共部门专科诊所为牙周炎患者提供牙科治疗的成本相当可观,与一些非传染性疾病相当。这些发现为确定潜在的成本降低策略、估计牙周炎管理的经济负担以及对专科牙周计划进行经济评估提供了依据。