Oliveira Hugo R, Hagenblad Jenny, Leino Matti W, Leigh Fiona J, Lister Diane L, Penã-Chocarro Leonor, Jones Martin K
IFM Biology, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 83, Sweden.
BMC Genet. 2014 May 8;15:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-54.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) panels recently developed for the assessment of genetic diversity in wheat are primarily based on elite varieties, mostly those of bread wheat. The usefulness of such SNP panels for studying wheat evolution and domestication has not yet been fully explored and ascertainment bias issues can potentially affect their applicability when studying landraces and tetraploid ancestors of bread wheat. We here evaluate whether population structure and evolutionary history can be assessed in tetraploid landrace wheats using SNP markers previously developed for the analysis of elite cultivars of hexaploid wheat.
We genotyped more than 100 tetraploid wheat landraces and wild emmer wheat accessions, some of which had previously been screened with SSR markers, for an existing SNP panel and obtained publically available genotypes for the same SNPs for hexaploid wheat varieties and landraces. Results showed that quantification of genetic diversity can be affected by ascertainment bias but that the effects of ascertainment bias can at least partly be alleviated by merging SNPs to haplotypes. Analyses of population structure and genetic differentiation show strong subdivision between the tetraploid wheat subspecies, except for durum and rivet that are not separable. A more detailed population structure of durum landraces could be obtained than with SSR markers. The results also suggest an emmer, rather than durum, ancestry of bread wheat and with gene flow from wild emmer.
SNP markers developed for elite cultivars show great potential for inferring population structure and can address evolutionary questions in landrace wheat. Issues of marker genome specificity and mapping need, however, to be addressed. Ascertainment bias does not seem to interfere with the ability of a SNP marker system developed for elite bread wheat accessions to detect population structure in other types of wheat.
最近开发的用于评估小麦遗传多样性的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)面板主要基于优良品种,大多是面包小麦品种。此类SNP面板在研究小麦进化和驯化方面的实用性尚未得到充分探索,并且在研究面包小麦的地方品种和四倍体祖先时,确定偏差问题可能会影响其适用性。我们在此评估是否可以使用先前开发用于分析六倍体小麦优良品种的SNP标记来评估四倍体地方品种小麦的群体结构和进化历史。
我们对100多个四倍体小麦地方品种和野生二粒小麦材料进行了基因分型,其中一些材料之前已用SSR标记进行过筛选,以检测一个现有的SNP面板,并获得了六倍体小麦品种和地方品种相同SNP的公开可用基因型。结果表明,遗传多样性的量化可能会受到确定偏差的影响,但通过将SNP合并为单倍型,确定偏差的影响至少可以部分得到缓解。群体结构和遗传分化分析表明,四倍体小麦亚种之间存在强烈的细分,除了硬粒小麦和铆接小麦无法区分。与SSR标记相比,可以获得更详细的硬粒小麦地方品种群体结构。结果还表明,面包小麦的祖先是二粒小麦,而非硬粒小麦,并且存在来自野生二粒小麦的基因流。
为优良品种开发的SNP标记在推断群体结构方面显示出巨大潜力,并且可以解决地方品种小麦中的进化问题。然而,标记基因组特异性和定位需求等问题需要解决。确定偏差似乎并不影响为优良面包小麦材料开发的SNP标记系统检测其他类型小麦群体结构的能力。