Imamura Yu, Lochhead Paul, Yamauchi Mai, Kuchiba Aya, Qian Zhi Rong, Liao Xiaoyun, Nishihara Reiko, Jung Seungyoun, Wu Kana, Nosho Katsuhiko, Wang Yaoyu E, Peng Shouyong, Bass Adam J, Haigis Kevin M, Meyerhardt Jeffrey A, Chan Andrew T, Fuchs Charles S, Ogino Shuji
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave,, Room M422, 02215 Boston, MA, USA.
Mol Cancer. 2014 May 31;13:135. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-135.
KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 are established predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Previous studies suggest that KRAS codon 61 and 146 mutations may also predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. However, clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic features of colorectal carcinoma with KRAS codon 61 or 146 mutation remain unclear.
We utilized a molecular pathological epidemiology database of 1267 colon and rectal cancers in the Nurse's Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We examined KRAS mutations in codons 12, 13, 61 and 146 (assessed by pyrosequencing), in relation to clinicopathological features, and tumor molecular markers, including BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), LINE-1 methylation, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Survival analyses were performed in 1067 BRAF-wild-type cancers to avoid confounding by BRAF mutation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute mortality hazard ratio, adjusting for potential confounders, including disease stage, PIK3CA mutation, CIMP, LINE-1 hypomethylation, and MSI.
KRAS codon 61 mutations were detected in 19 cases (1.5%), and codon 146 mutations in 40 cases (3.2%). Overall KRAS mutation prevalence in colorectal cancers was 40% (=505/1267). Of interest, compared to KRAS-wild-type, overall, KRAS-mutated cancers more frequently exhibited cecal location (24% vs. 12% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001), CIMP-low (49% vs. 32% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001), and PIK3CA mutations (24% vs. 11% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001). These trends were evident irrespective of mutated codon, though statistical power was limited for codon 61 mutants. Neither KRAS codon 61 nor codon 146 mutation was significantly associated with clinical outcome or prognosis in univariate or multivariate analysis [colorectal cancer-specific mortality hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.29-2.26 for codon 61 mutation; colorectal cancer-specific mortality HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.42-1.78 for codon 146 mutation].
Tumors with KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 account for an appreciable proportion (approximately 5%) of colorectal cancers, and their clinicopathological and molecular features appear generally similar to KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated cancers. To further assess clinical utility of KRAS codon 61 and 146 testing, large-scale trials are warranted.
KRAS基因第12和13密码子的突变是结直肠癌抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗已确定的预测生物标志物。既往研究提示,KRAS基因第61和146密码子突变也可能预测结直肠癌抗EGFR治疗的耐药性。然而,KRAS基因第61或146密码子突变的结直肠癌的临床病理、分子及预后特征仍不清楚。
我们利用了护士健康研究及卫生专业人员随访研究中1267例结肠癌和直肠癌的分子病理流行病学数据库。我们检测了KRAS基因第12、13、61和146密码子的突变(通过焦磷酸测序评估),并分析其与临床病理特征及肿瘤分子标志物的关系,这些分子标志物包括BRAF和PIK3CA突变、CpG岛甲基化表型(CIMP)、LINE-1甲基化及微卫星不稳定性(MSI)。对1067例BRAF野生型癌症进行生存分析,以避免BRAF突变的混杂影响。采用Cox比例风险模型计算死亡风险比,并对潜在混杂因素进行校正,这些因素包括疾病分期、PIK3CA突变、CIMP、LINE-1低甲基化及MSI。
检测到19例(1.5%)KRAS基因第61密码子突变,40例(3.2%)第146密码子突变。结直肠癌中KRAS突变的总体患病率为40%(=505/1267)。有趣的是,与KRAS野生型相比,总体上KRAS突变型癌症更常表现为盲肠部位(KRAS野生型为12%,KRAS突变型为24%;P<0.0001)、CIMP低(KRAS野生型为32%,KRAS突变型为49%;P<0.0001)及PIK3CA突变(KRAS野生型为11%,KRAS突变型为24%;P<0.0001)。无论突变密码子如何,这些趋势均很明显,尽管第61密码子突变体的统计效能有限。在单因素或多因素分析中,KRAS基因第61和146密码子突变均与临床结局或预后无显著相关性[第61密码子突变的结直肠癌特异性死亡风险比(HR)=0.81,95%置信区间(CI)=0.29 - 2.26;第146密码子突变的结直肠癌特异性死亡HR=0.86,95%CI=0.42 - 1.78]。
KRAS基因第61和146密码子突变的肿瘤占结直肠癌的相当比例(约5%),其临床病理和分子特征总体上似乎与KRAS基因第12或13密码子突变的癌症相似。为进一步评估KRAS基因第61和146密码子检测的临床应用价值,有必要开展大规模试验。