Phipps Amanda I, Limburg Paul J, Baron John A, Burnett-Hartman Andrea N, Weisenberger Daniel J, Laird Peter W, Sinicrope Frank A, Rosty Christophe, Buchanan Daniel D, Potter John D, Newcomb Polly A
Epidemiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jan;148(1):77-87.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease that can develop via several pathways. Different CRC subtypes, identified based on tumor markers, have been proposed to reflect these pathways. We evaluated the significance of these previously proposed classifications to survival.
Participants in the population-based Seattle Colon Cancer Family Registry were diagnosed with invasive CRC from 1998 through 2007 in western Washington State (N = 2706), and followed for survival through 2012. Tumor samples were collected from 2050 participants and classified into 5 subtypes based on combinations of tumor markers: type 1 (microsatellite instability [MSI]-high, CpG island methylator phenotype [CIMP] -positive, positive for BRAF mutation, negative for KRAS mutation); type 2 (microsatellite stable [MSS] or MSI-low, CIMP-positive, positive for BRAF mutation, negative for KRAS mutation); type 3 (MSS or MSI low, non-CIMP, negative for BRAF mutation, positive for KRAS mutation); type 4 (MSS or MSI-low, non-CIMP, negative for mutations in BRAF and KRAS); and type 5 (MSI-high, non-CIMP, negative for mutations in BRAF and KRAS). Multiple imputation was used to impute tumor markers for those missing data on 1-3 markers. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of subtypes with disease-specific and overall mortality, adjusting for age, sex, body mass, diagnosis year, and smoking history.
Compared with participants with type 4 tumors (the most predominant), participants with type 2 tumors had the highest disease-specific mortality (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.47-3.31); subjects with type 3 tumors also had higher disease-specific mortality (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.63). Subjects with type 5 tumors had the lowest disease-specific mortality (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.66). Associations with overall mortality were similar to those with disease-specific mortality.
Based on a large, population-based study, CRC subtypes, defined by proposed etiologic pathways, are associated with marked differences in survival. These findings indicate the clinical importance of studies into the molecular heterogeneity of CRC.
结直肠癌(CRC)是一种异质性疾病,可通过多种途径发展。基于肿瘤标志物确定的不同CRC亚型已被提出以反映这些途径。我们评估了这些先前提出的分类对生存的意义。
基于人群的西雅图结肠癌家族登记处的参与者于1998年至2007年在华盛顿州西部被诊断为侵袭性CRC(N = 2706),并随访至2012年。从2050名参与者中收集肿瘤样本,并根据肿瘤标志物的组合分为5种亚型:1型(微卫星高度不稳定[MSI]、CpG岛甲基化表型[CIMP]阳性、BRAF突变阳性、KRAS突变阴性);2型(微卫星稳定[MSS]或微卫星低度不稳定[MSI-low]、CIMP阳性、BRAF突变阳性、KRAS突变阴性);3型(MSS或MSI-low、非CIMP、BRAF突变阴性、KRAS突变阳性);4型(MSS或MSI-low、非CIMP、BRAF和KRAS突变阴性);5型(MSI-high、非CIMP、BRAF和KRAS突变阴性)。对1 - 3个标志物数据缺失的参与者使用多重填补法来填补肿瘤标志物。我们使用Cox回归来估计亚型与疾病特异性和总死亡率关联的风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI),并对年龄、性别、体重、诊断年份和吸烟史进行校正。
与4型肿瘤参与者(最常见)相比,2型肿瘤参与者的疾病特异性死亡率最高(HR = 2.20,95% CI:1.47 - 3.31);3型肿瘤参与者的疾病特异性死亡率也较高(HR = 1.32,95% CI:1.07 - 1.63)。5型肿瘤参与者的疾病特异性死亡率最低(HR = 0.30,95% CI:0.14 - 0.66)。与总死亡率的关联与疾病特异性死亡率相似。
基于一项大型的人群研究,由提出的病因途径定义CRC亚型与生存的显著差异相关。这些发现表明了结直肠癌分子异质性研究的临床重要性。