Coupe Nia, Anderson Emma, Gask Linda, Sykes Paul, Richards David A, Chew-Graham Carolyn
Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 May 1;15:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-78.
Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary care. However, there remains limited evidence on how to successfully implement this collaborative approach in UK primary care. This study aimed to explore to what extent CC impacts on professional working relationships, and if CC for depression could be implemented as routine in the primary care setting.
This qualitative study explored perspectives of the 6 case managers (CMs), 5 supervisors (trial research team members) and 15 general practitioners (GPs) from practices participating in a randomised controlled trial of CC for depression. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data was analysed using a two-step approach using an initial thematic analysis, and a secondary analysis using the Normalisation Process Theory concepts of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring with respect to the implementation of CC in primary care.
Supervisors and CMs demonstrated coherence in their understanding of CC, and consequently reported good levels of cognitive participation and collective action regarding delivering and supervising the intervention. GPs interviewed showed limited understanding of the CC framework, and reported limited collaboration with CMs: barriers to collaboration were identified. All participants identified the potential or experienced benefits of a collaborative approach to depression management and were able to discuss ways in which collaboration can be facilitated.
Primary care professionals in this study valued the potential for collaboration, but GPs' understanding of CC and organisational barriers hindered opportunities for communication. Further work is needed to address these organisational barriers in order to facilitate collaboration around individual patients with depression, including shared IT systems, facilitating opportunities for informal discussion and building in formal collaboration into the CC framework.
ISRCTN32829227 30/9/2008.
协作式照护(CC)是一种组织框架,通过个案管理员与更资深的医疗专业人员(督导员和全科医生)合作,为患者提供心理健康干预措施,对初级保健中抑郁症的管理有效。然而,关于如何在英国初级保健中成功实施这种协作方法的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在探讨协作式照护在多大程度上影响专业工作关系,以及抑郁症的协作式照护能否在初级保健环境中作为常规措施实施。
这项定性研究探讨了参与抑郁症协作式照护随机对照试验的6名个案管理员(CM)、5名督导员(试验研究团队成员)和15名全科医生(GP)的观点。访谈内容逐字转录,数据采用两步分析法进行分析,第一步进行主题分析,第二步运用常态化过程理论的连贯性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监测等概念,对初级保健中协作式照护的实施情况进行二次分析。
督导员和个案管理员在对协作式照护的理解上表现出连贯性,因此在提供和监督干预措施方面报告了较高水平的认知参与和集体行动。接受访谈的全科医生对协作式照护框架的理解有限,与个案管理员的协作也有限:已确定协作的障碍。所有参与者都认识到协作式抑郁症管理方法的潜在益处或实际益处,并能够讨论促进协作的方法。
本研究中的初级保健专业人员重视协作的潜力,但全科医生对协作式照护的理解以及组织障碍阻碍了沟通机会。需要进一步开展工作来解决这些组织障碍,以促进围绕抑郁症患者个体的协作,包括共享信息技术系统、提供非正式讨论机会以及将正式协作纳入协作式照护框架。
ISRCTN32829227,2008年9月30日。