Omole Olufemi B, Ayo-Yusuf Olalekan A, Ngobale Kabilabe N W
School of Health Systems & Public Health, University of Pretoria, PO Box 1266, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 May 6;15:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-85.
Evidence suggests that healthcare providers (HCPs) in South Africa do not consistently offer tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) during clinical consultations. In order to understand and explain this behaviour in a South African context, we conducted a qualitative exploration of HCPs' experiences, perceptions and behaviours regarding TDT.
Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses who were purposively selected. Themes were identified from interview transcripts using content analysis. Findings were triangulated and peer-reviewed, and were also verified by the participants.
Fifteen physicians and four nurses were interviewed, none of whom used tobacco. These participants perceived TDT as an important task, but could not consistently implement it during clinical consultations due to health systems constraints (time-constraints because of patient-overload, the unavailability of cessation medications and a lack of support for referrals), misperceptions and misconceptions (negative outcome expectations about the effectiveness and feasibility of TDT), socio-cultural barriers (counselling older persons was perceived as challenging) and personal limitations (perceived low self-efficacy, poor knowledge and skills on implementing any evidence-based TDT framework). Patients are therefore selectively screened based on clinical relevance and offered only prescriptive brief advice. Participants recommended several systems changes, including academic detailing of tobacco status, training HCPs and incorporating tobacco cessation medications in the Essential Drug List.
The reported selective screening and limited TDT interventions offered by HCPs are related to interactions between health systems constraints, personal limitations, and misperceptions and misconceptions about the effectiveness and feasibility of TDT during clinical consultation. Implementing the recommended systems changes has the potential to improve the implementation of TDT in South African primary health care (PHC).
有证据表明,南非的医疗服务提供者(HCPs)在临床会诊期间并未始终如一地提供烟草依赖治疗(TDT)。为了在南非背景下理解和解释这种行为,我们对HCPs关于TDT的经历、看法和行为进行了定性探索。
对经过有目的选择的医生和护士进行了个人定性访谈。使用内容分析法从访谈记录中确定主题。研究结果进行了三角互证和同行评审,并得到了参与者的验证。
采访了15名医生和4名护士,他们均不吸烟。这些参与者认为TDT是一项重要任务,但由于卫生系统的限制(患者过多导致时间紧张、戒烟药物无法获取以及缺乏转诊支持)、误解和错误观念(对TDT的有效性和可行性有负面结果预期)、社会文化障碍(认为为老年人提供咨询具有挑战性)以及个人局限性(自我效能感低、对实施任何循证TDT框架的知识和技能不足),在临床会诊期间无法始终如一地实施TDT。因此,根据临床相关性对患者进行选择性筛查,仅提供规范性简短建议。参与者建议进行多项系统变革,包括对烟草状况进行学术详述、培训HCPs以及将戒烟药物纳入基本药物清单。
HCPs报告的选择性筛查和有限的TDT干预与临床会诊期间卫生系统限制、个人局限性以及对TDT有效性和可行性的误解和错误观念之间的相互作用有关。实施建议的系统变革有可能改善南非初级卫生保健(PHC)中TDT的实施情况。