Dizon J M, Grimmer K, Louw Q, Machingaidze S, Parker H, Pillen H
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE), University of South Australia, City East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care (CEBHC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, 8000, Cape Town, South Africa.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Sep 15;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0243-3.
The South African allied health (AH) primary healthcare (PHC) workforce is challenged with the complex rehabilitation needs of escalating patient numbers. The application of evidence-based care using clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is one way to make efficient and effective use of resources. Although CPGs are common for AH in high-income countries, there is limited understanding of how to do this in low- to middle-income countries. This paper describes barriers and enablers for AH CPG uptake in South African PHC.
Semi-structured individual interviews were undertaken with 25 South African AH managers, policymakers, clinicians and academics to explore perspectives on CPGs. Interviews were conducted by researcher dyads, one being familiar with South African AH PHC practice and the other with CPG expertise. Rigour and transparency of data collection was ensured. Interview transcripts were analysed by structuring content into codes, categories and themes. Exemplar quotations were extracted to support themes.
CPGs were generally perceived to be relevant to assist AH providers to address the challenges of consistently providing evidence-based care in South African PHC settings. CPGs were considered to be tools for managing clinical, social and economic complexities of AH PHC practice, particularly if CPG recommendations were contextusalised. CPG uptake was one way to deal with increasing pressures to make efficient use of scarce financial resources, and to demonstrate professional legitimacy. Themes comprised organisational infrastructures and capacities for CPG uptake, interactions between AH actors and interaction with broader political structures, the nature of AH evidence in CPGs, and effectively implementing CPGs into practice.
CPGs contextualised to local circumstances offer South African PHC AH services with an efficient vehicle for putting evidence into practice. There are challenges to doing this, related to local barriers such as geography, AH training, workforce availability, scarce resources, an escalating number of patients requiring complex rehabilitation, and local knowledge. Concerted attempts to implement locally relevant CPGs for AH primary care in South Africa are required to improve widespread commitment to evidence-based care, as well as to plan efficient and effective service delivery models.
南非联合健康(AH)初级卫生保健(PHC)工作人员面临着患者数量不断增加带来的复杂康复需求的挑战。运用临床实践指南(CPG)实施循证护理是有效利用资源的一种方式。尽管CPG在高收入国家的AH领域很常见,但在低收入和中等收入国家,对于如何做到这一点的了解有限。本文描述了南非初级卫生保健中AH采用CPG的障碍和促进因素。
对25名南非AH管理人员、政策制定者、临床医生和学者进行了半结构化个人访谈,以探讨他们对CPG的看法。访谈由研究小组进行,其中一人熟悉南非AH初级卫生保健实践,另一人具有CPG专业知识。确保了数据收集的严谨性和透明度。通过将内容构建为代码、类别和主题来分析访谈记录。提取了示例引语以支持主题。
CPG通常被认为有助于AH提供者应对在南非初级卫生保健环境中持续提供循证护理的挑战。CPG被视为管理AH初级卫生保健实践的临床、社会和经济复杂性的工具,特别是如果CPG建议因地制宜的话。采用CPG是应对有效利用稀缺财政资源的压力不断增加以及证明专业合法性的一种方式。主题包括CPG采用的组织基础设施和能力、AH行为者之间的互动以及与更广泛政治结构的互动、CPG中AH证据的性质以及将CPG有效实施到实践中。
因地制宜的CPG为南非初级卫生保健AH服务提供了将证据付诸实践的有效途径。这样做存在挑战,与地理、AH培训、劳动力供应、资源稀缺、需要复杂康复的患者数量不断增加以及当地知识等当地障碍有关。需要共同努力在南非实施与当地相关的AH初级保健CPG,以提高对循证护理的广泛承诺,并规划高效有效的服务提供模式。