Dupont Diane, Waldner Cheryl, Bharadwaj Lalita, Plummer Ryan, Carter Blair, Cave Kate, Zagozewski Rebecca
Department of Economics, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.
School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 30;11(6):5889-903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110605889.
The relationship between tap water and health has been a topic of public concern and calls for better management in Canada since well-publicized contamination events in two provinces (Ontario and Saskatchewan) in 2000-2001. This study reports the perspectives on health risks from tap water and corresponding use of, and spending on, bottled water in a number of different communities in Canada. In 2009-2010, four First Nations communities (three from Ontario and one from Saskatchewan) and a geographically diverse sample of non-First Nations Canadians were surveyed about their beliefs concerning health risks from tap water and their spending practices for bottled water as a substitute. Responses to five identical questions were examined, revealing that survey respondents from Ontario First Nations communities were more likely than non-First Nations Canadians to believe bottled water is safer than tap water (OR 1.6); more likely to report someone became ill from tap water (OR 3.6); more likely to express water and health concerns related to tap water consumption (OR 2.4); and more likely to spend more on bottled water (OR 4.9). On the other hand, participants from one Saskatchewan First Nations community were less likely than non-First Nations Canadians to believe that someone had become ill from drinking tap water (OR 3.8), less likely to believe bottled water is safer than tap (OR 2.0), and less likely to have health concerns with tap water (OR 1.5). These differences, however, did not translate into differences in the likelihood of high bottled water expenditures or being a 100% bottled water consumer. The paper discusses how the differences observed may be related to water supply and regulation, trust, perceived control, cultural background, location, and past experience.
自2000 - 2001年安大略省和萨斯喀彻温省两个省份广为人知的污染事件以来,自来水与健康之间的关系一直是加拿大公众关注的话题,并呼吁进行更好的管理。本研究报告了加拿大一些不同社区对自来水健康风险的看法以及相应的瓶装水使用情况和支出情况。在2009 - 2010年,对四个原住民社区(三个来自安大略省,一个来自萨斯喀彻温省)以及不同地理位置的非原住民加拿大人进行了调查,询问他们对自来水健康风险的看法以及作为替代品的瓶装水的消费习惯。对五个相同问题的回答进行了分析,结果显示,安大略省原住民社区的受访者比非原住民加拿大人更有可能认为瓶装水比自来水更安全(比值比1.6);更有可能报告有人因自来水生病(比值比3.6);更有可能表达与饮用自来水相关的水和健康问题(比值比2.4);并且更有可能在瓶装水上花费更多(比值比4.9)。另一方面,萨斯喀彻温省一个原住民社区的参与者比非原住民加拿大人更不可能认为有人因饮用自来水生病(比值比3.8),更不可能认为瓶装水比自来水更安全(比值比2.0),并且对自来水产生健康担忧的可能性更小(比值比1.5)。然而,这些差异并没有转化为高瓶装水支出可能性或成为100%瓶装水消费者可能性的差异。本文讨论了观察到的差异可能如何与供水和监管、信任、感知控制、文化背景、地理位置和过去的经验相关。