Bhatt Amar B, Popescu Alexandra, Waterhouse Elizabeth J, Abou-Khalil Bassel W
*Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.; †Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.; and ‡Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, U.S.A.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jun;31(3):194-8. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000051.
Pentobarbital and propofol are used for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus or elevated intracranial pressure, typically with continuous EEG monitoring. We report a series of patients who developed generalized periodic discharges related to anesthetic withdrawal (GRAWs), different from previous seizure activity. At times, this pattern was misinterpreted as recurrent seizure activity, leading to reinstitution of drug-induced coma, but resolved spontaneously without additional treatment.We identified five patients who developed GRAWs during pentobarbital or propofol withdrawal. Two patients received pentobarbital for increased intracranial pressure. One patient received pentobarbital and propofol for encephalopathy accompanied by a rhythmic EEG pattern erroneously thought to be ictal. Two patients received pentobarbital for refractory partial status epilepticus. In all cases, anesthetic agents were withdrawn after 24 to 48 hours of burst suppression on EEG. We analyzed the course of GRAWs on EEG and the associated clinical outcomes.All five patients developed GRAWs, consisting of periodic 1 to 4 Hz generalized periodic discharge, not previously seen on EEG. In all cases, the pattern eventually resolved spontaneously, over 12 to 120 hours. However, in three cases, the pattern was initially thought to represent ictal activity, and drug-induced coma was reinitiated. The pattern recurred during repeated anesthetic withdrawal, was then recognized as nonictal, and then resolved without further treatment. In all cases but one, the patients exhibited improvement to near-baseline mentation.Generalized periodic discharges related to anesthetic withdrawal may occur de novo after pentobarbital or propofol withdrawal. They should resolve spontaneously without treatment and without recurrence of clinical seizure activity. However, GRAWs are not likely to represent status epilepticus and should not prompt resumption of drug-induced coma, unless there is reappearance of original electrographic seizure activity.
戊巴比妥和丙泊酚用于治疗难治性癫痫持续状态或颅内压升高,通常需持续进行脑电图监测。我们报告了一系列患者,他们出现了与麻醉药撤停相关的广泛性周期性放电(GRAWs),这与之前的癫痫活动不同。有时,这种模式被误诊为反复的癫痫发作活动,导致重新实施药物诱导昏迷,但未经额外治疗便自行缓解。我们确定了5例在戊巴比妥或丙泊酚撤停期间出现GRAWs的患者。2例患者因颅内压升高接受戊巴比妥治疗。1例患者因脑病伴有节律性脑电图模式(错误地认为是发作期)接受戊巴比妥和丙泊酚治疗。2例患者因难治性部分性癫痫持续状态接受戊巴比妥治疗。在所有病例中,脑电图出现爆发抑制24至48小时后停用麻醉剂。我们分析了脑电图上GRAWs的过程及相关临床结果。所有5例患者均出现GRAWs,表现为1至4赫兹的周期性广泛性周期性放电,这在之前的脑电图上未见。在所有病例中,这种模式最终在12至120小时内自行缓解。然而,在3例病例中,该模式最初被认为代表发作期活动,于是重新开始药物诱导昏迷。在反复的麻醉药撤停过程中该模式再次出现,随后被识别为非发作期,然后未经进一步治疗便自行缓解。除1例病例外,所有病例中的患者精神状态均改善至接近基线水平。与麻醉药撤停相关的广泛性周期性放电可能在戊巴比妥或丙泊酚撤停后新发。它们应自行缓解,无需治疗,且不会出现临床癫痫发作活动的复发。然而,GRAWs不太可能代表癫痫持续状态,不应促使重新开始药物诱导昏迷,除非原始的脑电图癫痫发作活动再次出现。