Pilcher Janine, Patel Mitesh, Smith Ann, Davies Cheryl, Pritchard Alison, Travers Justin, Black Peter, Weatherall Mark, Beasley Richard, Harwood Matire
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand; Capital & Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
Respirology. 2014 Aug;19(6):842-51. doi: 10.1111/resp.12319. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
There are significant health disparities between Māori and non-Māori with asthma, a pattern seen between other ethnic populations. This study investigates outcomes for Māori in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of combination budesonide/formoterol inhaler therapy in asthma.
This 24-week multicentre RCT recruited 303 adult asthma patients, 44 of whom were Māori. Participants were randomized to the single combination budesonide/formoterol inhaler as maintenance and reliever therapy ('SMART') regimen or 'standard' regimen (combination budesonide/formoterol inhaler for maintenance and salbutamol as reliever). Outcomes included patterns of beta-agonist inhaler use including 'high use' of reliever therapy (>8 actuations of budesonide/formoterol in excess of four maintenance doses per day for SMART and >16 actuations per day of salbutamol for standard). Differences in outcomes for Māori versus non-Māori were assessed using an interaction term between ethnicity and treatment.
With adjustment for ethnicity, the SMART group had fewer days of high use (relative rate (RR) 0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.85)), days of high use without medical review within 48 h (RR 0.49 (95% CI: 0.32-0.75)) and severe exacerbations (RR 0.54 (95% CI: 0.36-0.81)) compared with standard. The magnitude of the benefit from the SMART regimen was similar in Māori and non-Māori. Regardless of treatment regimen, Māori demonstrated more days of high use, high use without medical review and underuse of maintenance therapy.
The SMART regimen has a favourable risk/benefit profile in Māori. Days of high use, days of high use without medical review and underuse of maintenance treatment were greater in Māori, regardless of treatment regimen.
在哮喘患者中,毛利人与非毛利人之间存在显著的健康差异,这种模式在其他种族人群中也有体现。本研究调查了在一项关于布地奈德/福莫特罗联合吸入器治疗哮喘的随机对照试验(RCT)中毛利人的治疗结果。
这项为期24周的多中心RCT招募了303名成年哮喘患者,其中44名是毛利人。参与者被随机分配到单一布地奈德/福莫特罗联合吸入器作为维持和缓解治疗(“SMART”)方案或“标准”方案(布地奈德/福莫特罗联合吸入器用于维持治疗,沙丁胺醇用于缓解治疗)。结果包括β受体激动剂吸入器的使用模式,其中“高使用”定义为缓解治疗使用过量(对于SMART方案,每天超过4次维持剂量的布地奈德/福莫特罗使用超过8喷;对于标准方案,每天沙丁胺醇使用超过16喷)。使用种族与治疗之间的交互项评估毛利人与非毛利人在治疗结果上的差异。
在对种族进行调整后,与标准方案相比,SMART组的高使用天数(相对率(RR)0.57(95%置信区间(CI):0.38 - 0.85))、48小时内无医学评估的高使用天数(RR 0.49(95% CI:0.32 - 0.75))和严重加重次数(RR 0.54(95% CI:0.36 - 0.81))更少。SMART方案对毛利人和非毛利人的益处程度相似。无论治疗方案如何,毛利人的高使用天数、无医学评估的高使用天数以及维持治疗使用不足的天数更多。
SMART方案在毛利人中具有良好的风险/效益特征。无论治疗方案如何,毛利人的高使用天数、无医学评估的高使用天数以及维持治疗使用不足的天数更多。