Ramraje Sushma N, Pawar Veena I
Department of Pathology, Sir JJ group of hospitals, Grant Medical College, Mumbai, 400008 India ; Flat No. 2/15, Dhanwantari Building, Doctor's Quarters, Sir JJ Hospital Campus, Byculla, Mumbai 400008 India.
Department of Pathology, Sir JJ group of hospitals, Grant Medical College, Mumbai, 400008 India.
Indian J Surg. 2014 Apr;76(2):127-30. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0645-y. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
This study was undertaken to assess whether a routine histopathologic examination of two common surgical specimens (appendix and gallbladder) is needed and whether routine histopathologic examination has an impact on further management of patients. Histopathology reports of patients who had undergone appendicectomy and cholecystectomy, between 2006 and 2010, were analyzed retrospectively in the department of pathology of a tertiary care hospital. The case notes were retrieved in all cases of malignancies. Patients having a clinical diagnosis or suspicion of malignancy were excluded. The incidence and impact of unexpected pathologic diagnosis on postoperative management were noted. The study period included a total of 1,123 and 711 appendicectomy and cholecystectomy specimens, respectively. Fifteen (1.336 %) cases of appendicectomy specimens revealed incidental unexpected pathological diagnoses, which included tubercular appendicitis (n = 2), parasite (n = 8), neuroma (n = 1), carcinoid (n = 2), pseudomyxoma (n = 1), and adenocarcinoma (n = 1). About 88 % of such unexpected appendiceal findings had an impact on postoperative treatment. Unexpected pathologic gallbladder findings were found in 12 (1.68 %) of 711 cholecystectomy specimens. In 6 (0.84 %) cases, gallbladder cancer (GBC) was detected. Additional further management was required in 50 % of patients with unexpected gallbladder findings. Twenty of the total 1,834 specimens (1.090 %) had an impact on patient management or outcome and were not suspected on macroscopic examination at the time of surgery. These would have been missed had the specimens not been examined microscopically. The intraoperative diagnosis of the surgeon is therefore sometimes doubtful in detecting abnormalities of the appendix and gallbladder. This study supports the sending of all appendicectomy and cholecystectomy specimens for routine histopathological examination. Appendix and gallbladder should undergo routine histopathological examination. This is important in patients with advanced age and gallstones. Also, it is of great value in identifying unsuspected conditions which require further postoperative management. Selectively sending specimens for histopathological examination can result in reduced workload on the histopathology department without compromising patient safety.
本研究旨在评估是否需要对两种常见手术标本(阑尾和胆囊)进行常规组织病理学检查,以及常规组织病理学检查是否会对患者的进一步治疗产生影响。在一家三级医院的病理科,对2006年至2010年间接受阑尾切除术和胆囊切除术患者的组织病理学报告进行了回顾性分析。在所有恶性肿瘤病例中检索病历。排除临床诊断或怀疑为恶性肿瘤的患者。记录意外病理诊断对术后治疗的发生率和影响。研究期间分别包括1123例阑尾切除术标本和711例胆囊切除术标本。15例(1.336%)阑尾切除术标本显示意外的病理诊断,包括结核性阑尾炎(n = 2)、寄生虫(n = 8)、神经瘤(n = 1)、类癌(n = 2)、黏液性囊腺瘤(n = 1)和腺癌(n = 1)。约88%的此类意外阑尾发现对术后治疗有影响。在711例胆囊切除术标本中,12例(1.68%)发现意外的胆囊病理结果。在6例(0.84%)病例中检测到胆囊癌(GBC)。50%的意外胆囊发现患者需要进一步的后续治疗。在总共1834例标本中,20例(1.090%)对患者治疗或预后有影响,且在手术时肉眼检查未被怀疑。如果这些标本未进行显微镜检查,这些情况将会被漏诊。因此,外科医生的术中诊断在检测阑尾和胆囊异常时有时是可疑的。本研究支持将所有阑尾切除术和胆囊切除术标本送去进行常规组织病理学检查。阑尾和胆囊应进行常规组织病理学检查。这对老年和有胆结石的患者很重要。此外,在识别需要进一步术后治疗的未被怀疑的情况方面具有重要价值。选择性地送检标本进行组织病理学检查可以减少病理科的工作量,而不影响患者安全。