Suppr超能文献

术前放射治疗在预防髋臼骨折异位骨化方面与术后放射治疗效果相同吗?

Is preoperative radiation therapy as effective as postoperative radiation therapy for heterotopic ossification prevention in acetabular fractures?

作者信息

Archdeacon Michael T, d'Heurle Albert, Nemeth Nicole, Budde Bradley

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670212, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0212, USA,

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3389-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3670-2. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic approaches to prevent heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture surgery have included indomethacin and/or single-dose external beam radiation therapy administered after surgery. Although preoperative radiation has been used for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis in the THA population, to our knowledge, no studies have compared preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy in the acetabular fracture population.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether heterotopic ossification frequency and severity were different between patients with acetabular fracture treated with prophylactic radiation therapy preoperatively and postoperatively.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and December 2009, we treated 320 patients with a Kocher-Langenbeck approach for acetabular fractures, of whom 50 (34%) were treated with radiation therapy preoperatively and 96 (66%) postoperatively. Thirty-four (68%) and 71 (74%), respectively, had 6-month radiographs available for review and were included. For hospital logistical reasons, patients who underwent operative treatment on a Friday or Saturday received radiation therapy preoperatively, and all others received it postoperatively. The treatment groups were comparable in terms of most demographic parameters, injury severity, and fracture patterns. Six-month postoperative radiographs were reviewed and graded according to Brooker. Followup ranged from 6 to 93 months and 6 to 97 months for the preoperative and postoperative groups, respectively. Post hoc power analysis showed our study was powered to detect a difference of 22% or more between patients with severe heterotopic ossification. Sample size calculations showed 915 subjects would be needed to detect a 5% relative difference in severe heterotopic ossification status between groups.

RESULTS

We detected no difference in heterotopic ossification frequency between the preoperative (eight of 36, 22%) and postoperative (19 of 71, 27%) groups (p=0.609). There was also no difference in heterotopic ossification severity between groups (p=0.666). Two of 36 (6%) in the preoperative group and three of 71 (4%) in the postoperative group developed clinically significant Grade III heterotopic ossification. No patients developed Grade IV heterotopic ossification.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in heterotopic ossification frequency or severity when comparing preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy. However, given the relatively low frequency of heterotopic ossification in this population, in particular the frequency of severe or symptomatic heterotopic ossification, the possibility of a Type II error must be considered. Larger, prospective studies are required to confirm our no-difference finding, but insofar as the result in this fracture population mirrors that of the THA population, unless our finding is disproven, we believe radiation therapy can be given either before or after surgery, as dictated by the clinical scenario.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

髋臼骨折手术后预防异位骨化的方法包括吲哚美辛和/或术后单剂量外照射放疗。虽然术前放疗已用于全髋关节置换术人群的异位骨化预防,但据我们所知,尚无研究比较髋臼骨折人群术前和术后放疗的效果。

问题/目的:我们确定髋臼骨折患者术前和术后接受预防性放疗后异位骨化的频率和严重程度是否存在差异。

方法

2002年1月至2009年12月期间,我们采用Kocher-Langenbeck入路治疗了320例髋臼骨折患者,其中50例(34%)术前接受放疗,96例(66%)术后接受放疗。分别有34例(68%)和71例(74%)有术后6个月的X线片可供评估并纳入研究。由于医院后勤原因,在周五或周六接受手术治疗的患者术前接受放疗,其他所有患者术后接受放疗。治疗组在大多数人口统计学参数、损伤严重程度和骨折类型方面具有可比性。术后6个月的X线片根据布鲁克(Brooker)标准进行评估和分级。术前组和术后组的随访时间分别为6至93个月和6至97个月。事后效能分析表明,我们的研究有能力检测出严重异位骨化患者之间22%或更大的差异。样本量计算表明,需要915名受试者才能检测出两组之间严重异位骨化状态5%的相对差异。

结果

我们发现术前组(36例中的8例,22%)和术后组(71例中的19例,27%)异位骨化频率无差异(p = 0.609)。两组之间异位骨化严重程度也无差异(p = 0.666)。术前组36例中有2例(6%),术后组71例中有3例(4%)发生了具有临床意义的Ⅲ级异位骨化。没有患者发生Ⅳ级异位骨化。

结论

我们发现术前和术后放疗在异位骨化频率或严重程度上没有差异。然而,鉴于该人群中异位骨化的发生率相对较低,尤其是严重或有症状的异位骨化发生率,必须考虑Ⅱ类错误发生的可能性。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实我们的无差异发现,但就该骨折人群的结果与全髋关节置换术人群的结果相似而言,除非我们的发现被推翻,我们认为可根据临床情况在手术前或手术后进行放疗。

证据水平

Ⅲ级,治疗性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅《作者须知》。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7

本文引用的文献

2
Heterotopic ossification.异位骨化
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;12(2):116-25. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200403000-00007.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验