• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切换还是选通?心理时间认知模型中的注意力挑战。

Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time.

作者信息

Lejeune H

机构信息

Psychobiology of Temporal Processes Unit (PTPU), University of Liège, 5 Boulevard du Rectorat B32, Sart-Tilman 4000 Liege, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 1998 Dec;44(2):127-45. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00045-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00045-x
PMID:24896971
Abstract

This paper briefly outlines theories dealing with attentional processes, before the status of attention is evaluated within cognitive models of psychological time. Particular emphasis is put on comparing the temporal information processing model (TIP) and the attentional gate model (AGM). It is argued that certain functional attributes that the AGM splits between an attentional gate' and the switch located at the clock level of the TIP model were already ascribed to the switch and supported by previous animal data. Thus, the notion of an attentional switch' is favored over adding a `gate'. This does not exclude the possibility that the TIP model may be adapted to accommodate both prospective and retrospective timing data.

摘要

本文简要概述了与注意过程相关的理论,然后在心理时间的认知模型中评估注意的状态。特别强调了比较时间信息处理模型(TIP)和注意门控模型(AGM)。有人认为,AGM在“注意门控”和位于TIP模型时钟水平的切换之间划分的某些功能属性,已经归因于该切换,并得到了先前动物数据的支持。因此,“注意切换”的概念比添加一个“门控”更受青睐。这并不排除TIP模型可能被调整以适应前瞻性和回顾性计时数据的可能性。

相似文献

1
Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time.切换还是选通?心理时间认知模型中的注意力挑战。
Behav Processes. 1998 Dec;44(2):127-45. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00045-x.
2
Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to 'switching or gating?' by Lejeune).门控还是切换?门控是前瞻性定时的更好模型(对勒热纳提出的“切换还是门控?”的回应)。
Behav Processes. 2000 Jul 7;50(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00086-3.
3
Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to 'switching or gating?' by Lejeune)(1).门控还是切换?门控是前瞻性计时的更好模型(勒热纳对“切换还是门控?”的回应)(1) 。
Behav Processes. 2000 Dec 7;52(2-3):63-69. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00141-8.
4
Prospective timing, attention and the switch. A response to 'Gating or switching? gating is a better model of prospective timing' by Zakay.前瞻性计时、注意力与转换。对扎凯的《门控还是转换?门控是前瞻性计时的更好模型》一文的回应
Behav Processes. 2000 Dec 7;52(2-3):71-76. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00136-4.
5
Components of attentional set-switching.注意集切换的组成部分。
Exp Psychol. 2005;52(2):83-98. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.83.
6
Switch and maintenance of task set in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中任务集的切换与维持
Schizophr Res. 2006 Jun;84(2-3):345-58. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.01.022. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
7
Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.不同感觉通道之间的注意偏向:对动物时间辨别中使用的内部时钟、记忆和决策阶段的影响。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:528-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23457.x.
8
Task switching and subjective duration.任务切换与主观时长。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):531-43. doi: 10.1080/17470210903024768.
9
Selective impairment of attentional set shifting in adults with ADHD.注意缺陷多动障碍成人注意定势转移的选择性损伤。
Behav Brain Funct. 2018 Nov 10;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12993-018-0150-y.
10
Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching.任务切换中的注意惯性与空间注意的延迟定向。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1580-602. doi: 10.1037/a0036552. Epub 2014 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Do "auditory" and "visual" time really feel the same? Effects of stimulus modality on duration and passage-of-time judgements.“听觉”时间和“视觉”时间的感受真的相同吗?刺激模态对时长和时间流逝判断的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03131-5.
2
Spatial attention modulates time perception on the human torso.空间注意力调节对人体躯干的时间感知。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):779-793. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03025-6. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3
Time distortions induced by high-arousing emotional compared to low-arousing neutral faces: an event-related potential study.
高唤醒情绪面孔与低唤醒中性面孔诱发的时间扭曲:一项事件相关电位研究。
Psychol Res. 2023 Sep;87(6):1836-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01789-2. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Dissociable effects of emotional stimuli on electrophysiological indices of time and decision-making.情绪刺激对时间和决策的电生理指标的可分离影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0276200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276200. eCollection 2022.
5
mPFC catecholamines modulate attentional capture by appetitive distracters and attention to time in a peak-interval procedure in rats.前额皮质儿茶酚胺通过在大鼠的峰时程序中调节奖赏性分心物对注意力的捕获和对时间的注意力来调节注意。
Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;136(5):418-429. doi: 10.1037/bne0000528. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
The Influence of Emotional Awareness on Time Perception: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.情绪意识对时间知觉的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:704510. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704510. eCollection 2021.
7
How Facial Attractiveness Affects Time Perception: Increased Arousal Results in Temporal Dilation of Attractive Faces.面部吸引力如何影响时间感知:吸引力增加引发的唤醒导致对面部的时间膨胀效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 10;12:784099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784099. eCollection 2021.
8
Attention Does Not Affect the Speed of Subjective Time, but Whether Temporal Information Guides Performance: A Large-Scale Study of Intrinsically Motivated Timers in a Real-Time Strategy Game.注意并不会影响主观时间的速度,但时间信息是否引导表现:实时战略游戏中内在动机计时器的大规模研究。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Mar;45(3):e12939. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12939.
9
Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.促进自我控制的认知和行为训练干预措施。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):259-279. doi: 10.1037/xan0000208. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
Temporal Processing of Joyful and Disgusting Food Pictures by Women With an Eating Disorder.患有饮食失调症的女性对愉悦和令人厌恶的食物图片的时间处理
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Apr 6;12:129. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00129. eCollection 2018.