Fetterman J G, Dreyfus L R
Department of Psychology, Norwich University, Northfield, VT 05663, USA.
Department of Psychology, Loyola University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.
Behav Processes. 1986 Feb;12(2):111-23. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(86)90050-1.
Pigeons were trained on a pair comparison task where a red light of one duration was followed by a green light of a second duration. Following a duration pair two choice keys were lit and one choice was reinforced if the duration of red was longer than green, and the alternate choice was reinforced if green was longer than red. Duration pairs consisted of all possible combinations of the durations .5, 1, 2, and 4 sec in one condition, and 2, 4, 8, and 16 sec in a second condition. Generalization tests with novel duration pairs were given under both conditions. Under a final set of conditions, interstimulus intervals of 2, 5, 10, and 30 sec were interposed between the first (red) and second (green) durations. Pigeons responded appropriately in most cases, with accuracy a function of the relative temporal difference between the members of a duration pair. Accuracy on transfer problems was above 70% in most instances, but in some cases suggests factors apart from relative temporal differences influenced performance. Accuracy declined with increases in the interstimulus interval, but remained above chance levels even when the longest interstimulus interval was used.
鸽子接受了一项配对比较任务的训练,在该任务中,一种持续时间的红灯之后会出现另一种持续时间的绿灯。在一个持续时间对之后,两个选择键亮起,如果红色的持续时间长于绿色,则强化一种选择;如果绿色的持续时间长于红色,则强化另一种选择。持续时间对在一种条件下由0.5秒、1秒、2秒和4秒的所有可能组合组成,在第二种条件下由2秒、4秒、8秒和16秒组成。在两种条件下都对新的持续时间对进行了泛化测试。在最后一组条件下,在第一个(红色)和第二个(绿色)持续时间之间插入了2秒、5秒、10秒和30秒的刺激间隔。在大多数情况下,鸽子的反应是恰当的,准确性是持续时间对中成员之间相对时间差异的函数。在大多数情况下,迁移问题的准确率高于70%,但在某些情况下表明,除了相对时间差异之外,还有其他因素影响表现。随着刺激间隔的增加,准确率下降,但即使使用最长的刺激间隔,准确率仍高于随机水平。