S Afr Med J. 2014 Mar;104(3):204-9. doi: 10.7196/samj.7696.
BACKGROUND: The combined tuberculosis (TB) and HIV epidemics in South Africa (SA) have created enormous operational challenges for a health service that has traditionally run vertical programmes for TB treatment and antiretroviral therapy (ART) in separate facilities. This is particularly problematic for TB/HIV co-infected patients who need to access both services. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether integrated TB facilities had better TB treatment outcomes than single-service facilities in Cape Town, SA. METHODS: TB treatment outcomes were determined for newly registered, adult TB patients (aged > or = 18 years) at 13 integrated ART/TB primary healthcare (PHC) facilities and four single-service PHC facilities from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2010. A chi2 test adjusted for a cluster sample design was used to compare outcomes by type of facility. RESULTS: Of 13,542 newly registered patients, 10,030 received TB treatment in integrated facilities and 3,512 in single-service facilities. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups with HIV status determined for 9,351 (93.2%) and 3,227 (91.9%) patients, of whom 6 649 (66.3%) and 2,213 (63%) were HIV-positive in integrated facilities and single-service facilities, respectively. The median CD4+ count of HIV-positive patients was 152 cells/microl (interquartile range (IQR) 71-277) for integrated facilities and 148 cells/microl (IQR 67-260) for single-service facilities. There was no statistical difference in the TB treatment outcome profile between integrated and single-service facilities for all TB patients (p = 0.56) or for the sub-set of HIV-positive TB patients (p = 0.58) CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate improved TB treatment outcomes in integrated PHC facilities and showed that the provision of ART in the same facility as TB services was not associated with lower TB death and default rates.
背景:南非(SA)的结核病(TB)和艾滋病毒(HIV)疫情的综合影响,给传统上在不同设施中运行结核病治疗和抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)垂直项目的卫生服务带来了巨大的运营挑战。对于需要同时获得这两项服务的结核/艾滋病毒合并感染患者来说,这尤其成问题。
目的:确定在开普敦,南非,综合性结核病设施的结核病治疗结果是否优于单一服务设施。
方法:2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 6 月 30 日,在 13 个综合性 ART/TB 初级保健(PHC)设施和 4 个单一服务 PHC 设施中,对新登记的成年结核病患者(年龄≥18 岁)的结核病治疗结果进行了测定。采用卡方检验调整聚类样本设计,比较了不同类型设施的结果。
结果:在 13542 名新登记的患者中,有 10030 人在综合性设施中接受了结核病治疗,有 3512 人在单一服务设施中接受了结核病治疗。两组患者的基线特征无差异,其中 9351 名(93.2%)和 3227 名(91.9%)患者确定了 HIV 状态,其中 6649 名(66.3%)和 2213 名(63%)患者在综合性设施和单一服务设施中 HIV 阳性。HIV 阳性患者的中位数 CD4+细胞计数为 152 个/微升(四分位距(IQR)71-277),综合性设施为 148 个/微升(IQR 67-260)。所有结核病患者(p=0.56)或 HIV 阳性结核病患者亚组(p=0.58)的结核病治疗结果特征在综合性和单一服务设施之间无统计学差异。
结论:本研究并未显示综合性 PHC 设施在结核病治疗结果方面有所改善,而且提供 ART 的设施与结核病服务设施相同,与结核病死亡率和失访率较低无关。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013-12
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012-6-12
Health Policy Plan. 2014-1
BMC Infect Dis. 2018-7-31
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022-7-1
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018-12-15
Health Policy Plan. 2017-11-1