• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺波利生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物药物洗脱支架用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较

Nobori biolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Danzi Gian Battista, Piccolo Raffaele, Galasso Gennaro, Piscione Federico

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Ospedale "Santa Corona"

出版信息

Circ J. 2014;78(8):1858-66. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1558. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1253/circj.cj-13-1558
PMID:24899233
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Permanent polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents (DES) surface have been identified as triggers of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, efficacy and safety data for the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (BES), a biodegradable polymer DES, are limited, so the aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with the Nobori BES compared with permanent polymer DES in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Randomized trials comparing Nobori BES vs. other DES were included in the meta-analysis. The 12-month clinical endpoints were: target lesion revascularization (TLR), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST). Seven trials totaling 12,090 PCI patients met the inclusion criteria. Nobori BES vs. other DES had a comparable risk of TLR (odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.34; P=0.74), mortality (OR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28; P=0.98), MI (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.87-1.40; P=0.42) and definite/probable ST (OR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.45-2.25; P=0.99). Despite Nobori BES showing similar clinical results to sirolimus-, everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents, it was superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in reducing the risk of TLR (OR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.90; P=0.03)CONCLUSIONS:Nobori BES use is associated with a similar safety and efficacy as permanent polymer DES at 1-year follow-up, albeit it is superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in terms of TLR. Long-term follow-up data are needed in order to establish whether polymer degradation related to Nobori BES implantation improves clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架(DES)表面的永久性聚合物涂层已被确认为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不良事件的触发因素。然而,可生物降解聚合物DES——Nobori生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架(BES)的疗效和安全性数据有限,因此本研究的目的是评估与Nobori BES相比,接受PCI的患者使用永久性聚合物DES的临床结局。

方法与结果

比较Nobori BES与其他DES的随机试验被纳入荟萃分析。12个月的临床终点为:靶病变血运重建(TLR)、全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和支架血栓形成(ST)。共有7项试验、总计12090例接受PCI的患者符合纳入标准。Nobori BES与其他DES相比,TLR风险相当(优势比[OR]0.94;95%置信区间[CI],0.66 - 1.34;P = 0.74),死亡率(OR 1.00;95% CI,0.78 - 1.28;P = 0.98),MI(OR 1.10;95% CI,0.87 - 1.40;P = 0.42)以及明确/可能的ST(OR 1.01;95% CI,0.45 - 2.25;P = 0.99)。尽管Nobori BES显示出与西罗莫司、依维莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架相似的临床结果,但在降低TLR风险方面优于紫杉醇洗脱支架(OR 0.31;95% CI,0.10 - 0.90;P = 0.03)。

结论

在1年随访中,使用Nobori BES与永久性聚合物DES具有相似的安全性和疗效,尽管在TLR方面优于紫杉醇洗脱支架。需要长期随访数据以确定与Nobori BES植入相关的聚合物降解是否能改善临床结局。

相似文献

1
Nobori biolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.诺波利生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物药物洗脱支架用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较
Circ J. 2014;78(8):1858-66. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1558. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
2
Clinical outcomes of patients treated with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.使用Nobori生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架治疗的患者的临床结局:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 20;175(3):484-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
3
Biolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent) and COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) randomised trials.生物可吸收雷帕霉素洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病:NOBORI 生物可吸收雷帕霉素洗脱支架与 XIENCE/PROMUS 依维莫司洗脱支架(NEXT)和 Abluminal 可生物降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(COMPARE II)随机试验的汇总分析。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Mar 20;12(16):1970-1977. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00773.
4
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
5
Two-year clinical outcomes of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stents versus biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction with dyslipidemia after percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the KAMIR.佐他莫司和依维莫司洗脱耐用聚合物涂层支架与生物雷帕霉素洗脱可生物降解聚合物涂层支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性心肌梗死伴血脂异常患者中的两年临床结局:来自KAMIR的数据
Heart Vessels. 2019 Feb;34(2):237-250. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1251-0. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.生物可吸收聚合物与耐用聚合物载药及裸金属支架的临床疗效:来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.061. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
7
Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:来自 COMPARE II 试验的最终 5 年报告(管腔生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1215-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 May 31.
8
Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.比较使用可生物降解聚合物或耐用聚合物的第二代药物洗脱支架的随机试验的最终3年结果:NOBORI生物素洗脱支架与XIENCE/PROMUS依维莫司洗脱支架试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002817.
9
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction: From the Women in Innovation and Drug-Eluting Stents (WIN-DES) Collaboration.新一代药物洗脱支架在急性心肌梗死女性患者中的长期安全性和疗效:来自女性创新和药物洗脱支架(WIN-DES)合作研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):855-862. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1978.
10
Impact of current smoking on 2-year clinical outcomes between durable-polymer-coated stents and biodegradable-polymer-coated stents in acute myocardial infarction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention: Data from the KAMIR.在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功后急性心肌梗死后,比较持久聚合物涂层支架和可生物降解聚合物涂层支架对 2 年临床结局的影响:来自 KAMIR 的数据。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 5;13(10):e0205046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205046. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 9-Month Angiographic Follow-Up and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents and Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Single Coronary Artery Stenting.单支冠状动脉支架置入患者中可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架与第二代耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的9个月血管造影随访及长期临床结果比较
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020 Mar;36(2):97-104. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202003_36(2).20190729A.
2
A comparison of the main outcomes from BP-BES and DP-DES at five years of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis.BP-BES 和 DP-DES 五年随访主要结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 3;7(1):14997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14247-6.
3
The Ultimaster Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: An Updated Review of Clinical Evidence.
Ultimaster生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架:临床证据的最新综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Sep 6;17(9):1490. doi: 10.3390/ijms17091490.
4
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.用于经皮冠状动脉血运重建的超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架对比:BIOSCIENCE试验的2年结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003255. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255.