Jutel Marek
Department of Clinical Immunology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland ; ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland.
Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2014 Mar 12;1(2):213-219. doi: 10.1007/s40521-014-0013-1. eCollection 2014.
Current asthma therapies can effectively control symptoms and the on-going inflammatory process; however, they do not affect the underlying, dysregulated immune response. Thus, they are limited to blunting the progression of the disease, which relapses on ceasing the treatment. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only etiology-based treatment capable of disease modification. Recent evidence provided a plausible explanation for its multiple mechanisms inducing both rapid desensitization and long-term allergen-specific immune tolerance, as well as the suppression of allergic inflammation in the affected tissues. Although the current guideline documents give both subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) immunotherapy a conditional recommendation in allergic asthma due to the moderate and low quality of evidence, respectively, a growing body of evidence from double-blind, placebo-controlled studies shows that both SLIT and SCIT are effective in reducing symptom scores and medication use, improving quality of life, and inducing favorable changes in specific immunologic markers. Due to the very limited evidence from head-to-head comparative studies and variability of the end-point used in different studies, it is currently not possible to assess superiority of either route of vaccine administration.
目前的哮喘治疗方法可以有效控制症状和持续的炎症过程;然而,它们并不能影响潜在的、失调的免疫反应。因此,这些治疗方法仅限于延缓疾病的进展,一旦停止治疗,疾病就会复发。变应原特异性免疫疗法(AIT)是唯一能够改变疾病病程的基于病因的治疗方法。最近的证据为其多种机制提供了合理的解释,这些机制既能诱导快速脱敏和长期的变应原特异性免疫耐受,又能抑制受影响组织中的过敏性炎症。尽管目前的指南文件分别基于中等质量和低质量的证据,对皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)和舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)在过敏性哮喘中给出了有条件的推荐,但越来越多来自双盲、安慰剂对照研究的证据表明,SLIT和SCIT在降低症状评分和药物使用、改善生活质量以及诱导特定免疫标志物的有利变化方面均有效。由于来自直接比较研究的证据非常有限,且不同研究中使用的终点存在差异,目前无法评估两种疫苗接种途径的优越性。