Kaneko Fuminari, Hayami Tatsuya, Aoyama Toshiyuki, Kizuka Tomohiro
Laboratory of SensoryMotor Science and Sports Neuroscience, Second Division of Physical Therapy, Sapporo Medical University, West 17- South 1, Chuo-ku, Sapporo City, Japan.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jun 5;11:94. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-94.
The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition.
MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES.
MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.
与单独的电刺激或自主训练相比,自主努力与功能性电刺激(ES)相结合似乎在诱导运动皮层可塑性方面具有更大的潜力。然而,尚不清楚来自中枢神经系统的运动指令、来自外周器官的传入输入,或两者对于诱导对皮质兴奋性的促进作用是否不可或缺。为了阐明在神经肌肉电刺激期间,自主运动指令是否能增强皮质脊髓束(CoST)兴奋性,而不产生自主肌肉收缩(VMC),我们使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究了运动想象(MI)与肌肉电刺激相结合对CoST兴奋性的影响。
8名神经系统健康的男性受试者参与了本研究。设定了5种条件(静息、MI、ES、ES+MI[ESMI]和VMC)。在ES条件下,当受试者放松时,对第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)施加50Hz的刺激,持续3至5秒。在MI条件下,指示受试者想象外展其食指。在ESMI条件下,在受试者开始想象食指外展后约1秒施加ES。在VMC条件下,受试者调节食指外展的力量以匹配目标水平,该目标水平设定为ES条件下产生的水平。在FDI的热点部位施加TMS,并在每种条件下测量运动诱发电位(MEP)的幅度和潜伏期。
VMC和ESMI期间的MEP幅度显著大于其他条件下的幅度;这两种条件下的MEP幅度无显著差异。MI和VMC期间诱发的MEP潜伏期显著短于静息和ES期间诱发的潜伏期。
ESMI中MEP的急性增强可能表明,自主运动驱动在无实际肌肉收缩的情况下,对增强CoST兴奋性有显著作用。