Unit of Neuropsychology of Developmental Disorders, Department of Child Psychopathology, Scientific Institute IRCCS "E. Medea" Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 19;8:313. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00313. eCollection 2014.
The nature of Rapid Auditory Processing (RAP) deficits in dyslexia remains debated, together with the specificity of the problem to certain types of stimuli and/or restricted subgroups of individuals. Following the hypothesis that the heterogeneity of the dyslexic population may have led to contrasting results, the aim of the study was to define the effect of age, dyslexia subtype and comorbidity on the discrimination and reproduction of non-verbal tone sequences. Participants were 46 children aged 8-14 (26 with dyslexia, subdivided according to age, presence of a previous language delay, and type of dyslexia). Experimental tasks were a Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) (manipulating tone length, ISI and sequence length), and a Pattern Discrimination Task. Dyslexic children showed general RAP deficits. Tone length and ISI influenced dyslexic and control children's performance in a similar way, but dyslexic children were more affected by an increase from 2 to 5 sounds. As to age, older dyslexic children's difficulty in reproducing sequences of 4 and 5 tones was similar to that of normally reading younger (but not older) children. In the analysis of subgroup profiles, the crucial variable appears to be the advantage, or lack thereof, in processing long vs. short sounds. Dyslexic children with a previous language delay obtained the lowest scores in RAP measures, but they performed worse with shorter stimuli, similar to control children, while dyslexic-only children showed no advantage for longer stimuli. As to dyslexia subtype, only surface dyslexics improved their performance with longer stimuli, while phonological dyslexics did not. Differential scores for short vs. long tones and for long vs. short ISIs predict non-word and word reading, respectively, and the former correlate with phonemic awareness. In conclusion, the relationship between non-verbal RAP, phonemic skills and reading abilities appears to be characterized by complex interactions with subgroup characteristics.
阅读障碍中快速听觉处理 (RAP) 缺陷的本质仍存在争议,问题的特殊性也存在争议,即某些类型的刺激和/或特定亚组的个体。根据阅读障碍人群的异质性可能导致对比结果的假设,本研究旨在定义年龄、阅读障碍亚型和合并症对非言语音调序列的辨别和再现的影响。参与者为 46 名 8-14 岁的儿童(26 名患有阅读障碍,根据年龄、先前语言延迟的存在和阅读障碍的类型进行细分)。实验任务包括时间顺序判断 (TOJ)(操纵音长、ISI 和序列长度)和模式辨别任务。阅读障碍儿童表现出普遍的 RAP 缺陷。音长和 ISI 以相似的方式影响阅读障碍和对照组儿童的表现,但阅读障碍儿童对从 2 到 5 个声音的增加更为敏感。至于年龄,年长的阅读障碍儿童再现 4 个和 5 个音调序列的困难与正常阅读的年幼(但不是年长)儿童相似。在亚组特征分析中,关键变量似乎是处理长音和短音的优势或缺乏。有先前语言延迟的阅读障碍儿童在 RAP 测量中得分最低,但他们对较短的刺激表现更差,与对照组儿童相似,而阅读障碍儿童对较长的刺激则没有优势。至于阅读障碍亚型,只有表面阅读障碍者随着刺激的延长而提高了他们的表现,而语音阅读障碍者则没有。短音与长音、长 ISI 与短 ISI 的差异分数分别预测了非词和单词阅读,前者与语音意识相关。总之,非言语 RAP、语音技能和阅读能力之间的关系似乎具有与亚组特征复杂相互作用的特点。