Kizilirmak Jasmin M, Rösler Frank, Khader Patrick H
Clinic for Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Germany.
Department of Biological and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Germany.
Brain Cogn. 2014 Oct;90:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
How do we control the successive retrieval of behaviorally relevant information from long-term memory (LTM) without being distracted by other potential retrieval targets associated to the same retrieval cues? Here, we approach this question by investigating the nature of trial-by-trial dynamics of selective LTM retrieval, i.e., in how far retrieval in one trial has detrimental or facilitatory effects on selective retrieval in the following trial. Participants first learned associations between retrieval cues and targets, with one cue always being linked to three targets, forming small associative networks. In successive trials, participants had to access either the same or a different target belonging to either the same or a different cue. We found that retrieval times were faster for targets that had already been relevant in the previous trial, with this facilitatory effect being substantially weaker when the associative network changed in which the targets were embedded. Moreover, staying within the same network still had a facilitatory effect even if the target changed, which became evident in a relatively higher memory performance in comparison to a network change. Furthermore, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) showed topographically and temporally dissociable correlates of these effects, suggesting that they result from combined influences of distinct processes that aid memory retrieval when relevant and irrelevant targets change their status from trial to trial. Taken together, the present study provides insight into the different processing stages of memory retrieval when fast switches between retrieval targets are required.
我们如何在不被与相同检索线索相关的其他潜在检索目标分散注意力的情况下,控制从长期记忆(LTM)中连续检索行为相关信息?在这里,我们通过研究选择性LTM检索的逐次试验动态的本质来探讨这个问题,即一次试验中的检索对后续试验中的选择性检索有多大的有害或促进作用。参与者首先学习检索线索与目标之间的关联,其中一个线索总是与三个目标相关联,形成小的关联网络。在连续试验中,参与者必须访问属于相同或不同线索的相同或不同目标。我们发现,与前一次试验中已经相关的目标相比,检索时间更快,当目标所嵌入的关联网络发生变化时,这种促进作用会显著减弱。此外,即使目标发生变化,停留在同一网络中仍然具有促进作用,这在与网络变化相比相对较高的记忆表现中变得明显。此外,事件相关脑电位(ERP)显示了这些效应在地形和时间上可分离的相关性,表明它们是由不同过程的综合影响导致的,当相关和不相关目标在试验之间改变其状态时,这些过程有助于记忆检索。总之,本研究为需要在检索目标之间快速切换时记忆检索的不同处理阶段提供了见解。