Unsworth Nash, Spillers Gregory J, Brewer Gene A
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2397-410. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.690438. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
In two experiments, the locus of individual differences in working memory capacity and long-term memory recall was examined. Participants performed categorical cued and free recall tasks, and individual differences in the dynamics of recall were interpreted in terms of a hierarchical-search framework. The results from this study are in accordance with recent theorizing suggesting a strong relation between working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory. Furthermore, the results also indicate that individual differences in categorical recall are partially due to differences in accessibility. In terms of accessibility of target information, two important factors drive the difference between high- and low-working-memory-capacity participants. Low-working-memory-capacity participants fail to utilize appropriate retrieval strategies to access cues, and they also have difficulty resolving cue overload. Thus, when low-working-memory-capacity participants were given specific cues that activated a smaller set of potential targets, their recall performance was the same as that of high-working-memory-capacity participants.
在两项实验中,研究了工作记忆容量和长期记忆回忆中个体差异的所在之处。参与者执行了分类线索回忆和自由回忆任务,并根据分层搜索框架解释了回忆动态中的个体差异。本研究的结果与最近的理论相符,该理论表明工作记忆容量与从长期记忆中检索之间存在密切关系。此外,结果还表明分类回忆中的个体差异部分归因于可及性的差异。就目标信息的可及性而言,两个重要因素导致了高工作记忆容量和低工作记忆容量参与者之间的差异。低工作记忆容量的参与者未能运用适当的检索策略来获取线索,并且他们在解决线索过载方面也存在困难。因此,当给低工作记忆容量的参与者提供激活较小潜在目标集的特定线索时,他们的回忆表现与高工作记忆容量的参与者相同。