Hunter Helen K, Bolinskey P Kevin, Novi Jonathan H, Hudak Daniel V, James Alison V, Myers Kevin R, Schuder Kelly M
a Department of Psychology , Indiana State University.
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(6):596-603. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.922093. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
This study investigates the extent to which the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) profiles of 52 individuals making up a psychometrically identified schizotypes (SZT) sample could be successfully discriminated from the protocols of 52 individuals in a matched comparison (MC) sample. Replication analyses were performed with an additional 53 pairs of SZT and MC participants. Results showed significant differences in mean T-score values between these 2 groups across a variety of MMPI-2-RF scales. Results from discriminant function analyses indicate that schizotypy can be predicted effectively using 4 MMPI-2-RF scales and that this method of classification held up on replication. Additional results demonstrated that these MMPI-2-RF scales nominally outperformed MMPI-2 scales suggested by previous research as being indicative of schizophrenia liability. Directions for future research with the MMPI-2-RF are suggested.
本研究调查了由52名构成心理测量学确定的分裂型人格障碍(SZT)样本的个体的明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2修订版(MMPI-2-RF)剖面图,与匹配对照(MC)样本中52名个体的测验记录相比,能够成功区分的程度。对另外53对SZT和MC参与者进行了重复分析。结果显示,在各种MMPI-2-RF量表上,这两组之间的平均T分数值存在显著差异。判别函数分析结果表明,使用4个MMPI-2-RF量表可以有效地预测分裂型人格障碍,并且这种分类方法在重复分析中依然成立。其他结果表明,这些MMPI-2-RF量表在名义上优于先前研究中表明与精神分裂症易感性相关的MMPI-2量表。文中还提出了未来使用MMPI-2-RF进行研究的方向。