Anquinet Livia, Rietjens Judith A, Mathers Nigel, Seymour Jane, van der Heide Agnes, Deliens Luc
End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jan;49(1):98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
One palliative care approach that is increasingly being used at home for relieving intolerable suffering in terminally ill patients is continuous sedation until death. Its provision requires a multidisciplinary team approach, with adequate collaboration and communication. However, it is unknown how general practitioners (GPs) and home care nurses experience being involved in the use of sedation at home.
To present case-based GP and nurse descriptions of their collaboration, roles, and responsibilities during the process of continuous sedation until death at home in Belgium, The Netherlands, and the U.K.
We held in-depth qualitative interviews with 25 GPs and 26 nurses closely involved in the care of 29 adult cancer patients who received continuous sedation until death at home.
We found that, in Belgium and The Netherlands, it was the GP who typically made the final decision to use sedation, whereas in the U.K., it was predominantly the nurse who both encouraged the GP to prescribe anticipatory medication and decided when to use the prescription. Nurses in the three countries reported that they commonly perform and monitor sedation in the absence of the GP, which they reported to experience as "emotionally burdensome."
We found variety among the countries studied regarding the decision making and provision of continuous sedation until death at home. These differences, among others, may be the result of different organizational contexts in the three countries such as the use of anticipatory medication in the U.K.
一种越来越多地在家庭中用于缓解绝症患者难以忍受的痛苦的姑息治疗方法是持续镇静直至死亡。其实施需要多学科团队协作,进行充分的合作与沟通。然而,全科医生(GP)和家庭护理护士在参与家庭镇静治疗方面的体验尚不清楚。
呈现基于案例的全科医生和护士对在比利时、荷兰和英国在家中进行持续镇静直至死亡过程中他们的合作、角色和职责的描述。
我们对25名全科医生和26名护士进行了深入的定性访谈,他们密切参与了29名成年癌症患者的护理,这些患者在家中接受了持续镇静直至死亡。
我们发现,在比利时和荷兰,通常是全科医生做出使用镇静的最终决定,而在英国,主要是护士既鼓励全科医生开具预发性药物,又决定何时使用该处方。这三个国家的护士报告说,他们通常在没有全科医生在场的情况下实施和监测镇静,他们表示这在情感上是“沉重的负担”。
我们发现,在所研究的国家中,关于在家中进行持续镇静直至死亡的决策和实施存在差异。这些差异可能是由于这三个国家不同的组织环境等因素造成的,比如英国使用预发性药物的情况。