Suppr超能文献

[早期老年康复:最年长者的机遇]

[Early geriatric rehabilitation: an opportunity for the oldest old].

作者信息

Kwetkat A, Lehmann T, Wittrich A

机构信息

Klinik für Geriatrie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Deutschland,

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Jul;47(5):372-8. doi: 10.1007/s00391-014-0660-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians in Germany who are not specialized in geriatric medicine often have to make decisions regarding referral of patients for early geriatric rehabilitation. The risk of inadequate patient allocation is due to lack of knowledge or underestimation of the potential benefit of early rehabilitation in reducing a patient's need of care. Particularly the oldest old are affected by those inadequate decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the nationwide database Gemidas Pro, the data sets of ≥ 90-year-old patients were analysed regarding diagnoses, multimorbidity, gender, length of stay, procedures, outcome parameters as nursing personnel regulation (PPR), Barthel index and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test compared to younger age groups. Data from 85 acute inpatient geriatric institutions during the period from January 2006 to December 2009 were included.

RESULTS

Neither the analysis of the diagnosis nor multimorbidity showed relevant differences compared to younger patients. Despite poorer functional status at admission, the ≥ 90 year olds experienced a 25 % increase in the activities of daily living (ADL) measured by PPR, 30 % increase in mobility classification based on the TUG and 59 % increase in ADL measured with the Barthel index. These changes were significantly different. In addition, the length of stay was 18.96 days on average in the group of ≥ 90-year-old patients, which was but not significantly shorter than the length of stay in the group of 70- to 79-year-old (19.7 days) and 80- to 89-year-old patients (19.65 days).

CONCLUSION

The analyses show that the oldest old suffer from more severe deficits in functional status on admission in acute geriatric wards compared to younger patient groups. However, on discharge the oldest old show a significant and relevant increase in mobility and ADL without increase in length of stay.

摘要

背景

在德国,并非老年医学专科的医生常常需要就患者早期老年康复转诊事宜做出决策。患者分配不当的风险源于缺乏相关知识,或是低估了早期康复对减少患者护理需求的潜在益处。尤其是高龄老人深受这些不当决策的影响。

材料与方法

基于全国性数据库Gemidas Pro,分析了90岁及以上患者的数据集,内容涉及诊断、多病共存情况、性别、住院时长、治疗程序、结局参数,如护理人员配置率(PPR)、巴氏指数以及与年轻年龄组相比的计时起立行走测试(TUG)。纳入了2006年1月至2009年12月期间85家急性老年住院机构的数据。

结果

与年轻患者相比,无论是诊断分析还是多病共存情况分析均未显示出显著差异。尽管入院时功能状态较差,但90岁及以上老人以PPR衡量的日常生活活动(ADL)增加了25%,基于TUG的活动能力分级增加了30%,以巴氏指数衡量的ADL增加了59%。这些变化具有显著差异。此外,90岁及以上患者组的平均住院时长为18.96天,虽略短于70至79岁组(19.7天)和80至89岁组患者(19.65天),但差异不显著。

结论

分析表明,与年轻患者组相比,高龄老人在急性老年病房入院时功能状态存在更严重的缺陷。然而,出院时高龄老人的活动能力和ADL显著且相关地增加,同时住院时长并未增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验